↓ Skip to main content

IOP Publishing

Article Metrics

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 2,269)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
82 news outlets
blogs
13 blogs
twitter
300 tweeters
facebook
28 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users
video
3 video uploaders

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), August 2016
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/084011
Authors

Christine Shearer, Mick West, Ken Caldeira, Steven J Davis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 300 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
France 2 4%
Spain 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 49 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 34%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 16%
Psychology 6 11%
Chemistry 5 9%
Unspecified 5 9%
Other 22 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 996. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,560
of 10,787,261 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#7
of 2,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168
of 264,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#1
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,787,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.