RT @picazomario: Lectura recomendable (la ciencia detrás de .. ) para aclaraciones varias ... https://t.co/LzbjEZkveK
RT @Guanmi79: La ciencia "subvencionada" Vete y te acuestas @picazomario MERCENARIO DEL CLIMA https://t.co/SLVPEA28w0
La ciencia "subvencionada" Vete y te acuestas @picazomario MERCENARIO DEL CLIMA https://t.co/SLVPEA28w0
RT @picazomario: Lectura recomendable (la ciencia detrás de .. ) para aclaraciones varias ... https://t.co/LzbjEZkveK
RT @picazomario: Lectura recomendable (la ciencia detrás de .. ) para aclaraciones varias ... https://t.co/LzbjEZkveK
RT @mOrtiz_RT: Pues a mí me gustaría saber cómo "la ciencia" explica esto 👇 https://t.co/rWg12SnPK5
Sí Mario Picachu te dice que no es una conspiración, es la prueba definitiva de que sí lo es.
RT @picazomario: Lectura recomendable (la ciencia detrás de .. ) para aclaraciones varias ... https://t.co/LzbjEZkveK
RT @picazomario: Lectura recomendable (la ciencia detrás de .. ) para aclaraciones varias ... https://t.co/LzbjEZkveK
RT @picazomario: Lectura recomendable (la ciencia detrás de .. ) para aclaraciones varias ... https://t.co/LzbjEZkveK
RT @picazomario: Lectura recomendable (la ciencia detrás de .. ) para aclaraciones varias ... https://t.co/LzbjEZkveK
RT @mOrtiz_RT: Pues a mí me gustaría saber cómo "la ciencia" explica esto 👇 https://t.co/rWg12SnPK5
RT @picazomario: Lectura recomendable (la ciencia detrás de .. ) para aclaraciones varias ... https://t.co/LzbjEZkveK
Pues a mí me gustaría saber cómo "la ciencia" explica esto 👇 https://t.co/rWg12SnPK5
RT @picazomario: Lectura recomendable (la ciencia detrás de .. ) para aclaraciones varias ... https://t.co/LzbjEZkveK
Las RRSS son una oportunidad para comunicar con excelencia, y para mostrar la mediocridad e ignorancia de inadaptados que no son conscientes de la responsabilidad que hay que tener para publicar algo. Aquí un informe para “iluminar” a burros conspiranoicos
Lectura recomendable (la ciencia detrás de .. ) para aclaraciones varias ... https://t.co/LzbjEZkveK
Lectura recomendable para aclaraciones varias ... https://t.co/LzbjEZkveK
@Concern70732755 Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= Chemtrails https://t.co/WlwT3HH2XL https://t.co/hQKlQU5fUv https://t.co/0QRFanmixG (Journal) https://t.co/QU70MvttWn https://t.co/WSfaQddUd5 (L) Passenger aircraft don't look like this (R)
@Jacob8775 @unhealthytruth I'll probably take the simplest solution until chemtrail advocates can come up with actual proof. https://t.co/QzdFu6eXDn https://t.co/fZnNs1XXep https://t.co/WP11tysRoR
@Rub_dc Imagino que lo conocerás ya...https://t.co/C4gBaEtgVj
RT @Placeb0Mad: @AEMET_Esp Este es el famoso "paper" al que hace referencia AEMET para afirmar, prácticamente, que somos unos magufos(basta…
RT @picazomario: @metbeni Ciencia pura y dura para las que tengan dudas ... https://t.co/GPOAxpQ3BJ
@sergigm87 @AEMET_Esp ya que te gustan los trabajos científicos.... https://t.co/xlLtqErJ6c
RT @Foro_DOculta: En 2016, dos científicos de la Universidad de California, realizaron un sondeo entre 77 científicos, meteorólogos, químic…
RT @Foro_DOculta: En 2016, dos científicos de la Universidad de California, realizaron un sondeo entre 77 científicos, meteorólogos, químic…
En 2016, dos científicos de la Universidad de California, realizaron un sondeo entre 77 científicos, meteorólogos, químicos y físicos, sobre la veracidad de los argumentos en relación con los chemtrails. (https://t.co/8ESp4rXDFD) 🔽
@Q__talk @Martian28211442 @Shayan86 Man, it's been years since I've heard anyone trying to peddle chemtrails. I guess I don't get around enough anymore. https://t.co/f363bEGjQw
@azanathos @GeoingenieriaMu @ElTiempoes @picazomario Y éste tb que he encontrado es del 2016: https://t.co/PNAUHGuCgy 7 de noviembre de 2022 https://t.co/VJNUXkTtCr El estudio original: https://t.co/WF6fB7UD01 traduce del inglés Tienes para leer y si no,
So I looked it up at "google scholar" First article https://t.co/ym3joOPI5E Second https://t.co/zt6NdrdmVz Third https://t.co/LmhdLe5nw7 Fourth https://t.co/KcdtBYoiuv I had 148,000 hits in 30 seconds I looked at the first few pages All debunked chem
Biggest manipulation in my opinion was on climate change. For example this public article: https://t.co/u6NKvSu8Zv We can see how is simply bullshit as the sample frame is not representative of the target population. In poor words, they asked to 550 exper
@ramigolo @navedelmisterio Me despido con un poco de ciencia. Buenas tardes. https://t.co/buGO8LGdeO
@JossetHelene article scientifique justement pour faire justice face à des interrogations sur ces fameux chemtrails, avec les méthodes d'analyse utilisées. En bref que de la transparence et de la rigueur. Et lisez le réellement sans que votre égo le mett
@DissocialSpace @Elizabeth07777 Atmospheric Scientist DEBUNKS chemtrails here: Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/xYgV53in9O Re: cloud seeding: $23 MILLION per year wast
"We might not convince die-hard believers that their beloved secret spraying program is just a paranoid fantasy, but hopefully their friends will accept the facts.'" --Ken Caldeira (Atmospheric Scientist DEBUNKING Chemtrail Conspiracy Theories) https:/
@NJKtu @EstoyAvisando No desacredito nada, digo que un fragmento de video sin contexto no prueba algo, si por esas vamos tu niegas lo que afirma el EPA o la propia comunidad cientifica https://t.co/Ff8XfA92fQ https://t.co/xkEKtQ5nmN
@ronin19217435 Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraft don't look like this (R) T
@miguel_ruiz3 Si leyeras antes de comentar, te encontrarías uno de los argumentos en el hilo ☺️ https://t.co/PaDr2ySjr7
Como chemtrails están algunas de la azotea.
En fin… https://t.co/nkUQ21e1gX
🔴 ¿Existe consenso científico sobre la posible existencia de un programa atmosférico secreto de gran escala? Un estudio de la Universidad de California presentaba la opinión de 77 científicos. No encontraron ninguna evidencia. https://t.co/QveW13YBxA htt
@shae33172 Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraft don't look like this (R) This
RT @picazomario: @metbeni Ciencia pura y dura para las que tengan dudas ... https://t.co/GPOAxpQ3BJ
@metbeni Ciencia pura y dura para las que tengan dudas ... https://t.co/GPOAxpQ3BJ
Seguro que sirve de poco pero si me ahorro alguna fotito chemtrailera ya me conformo. Has leído el estudio al que enlaza el escrito? https://t.co/wBBYJKO9lg https://t.co/kcNdr2sq8M
@amabipbip @Emmeeffecieffe @Alexleserveur @Non_MaisDisDonc @Forbes @OuestFrance @AfpFactuel Je connais déjà, j'ai déjà lu. Elle racontait n'importe quoi. Intéressez vous à la science, la vraie, et pas aux inconnus qui inventent des théories absurdes. Par e
@JulieAn85427965 @burrosavic @StevenJMiles Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraf
@seraphus7 @LulzLyle @psykogus @FAKE_Investiga Tiens un article sourcé avec les références des scientifiques et spécialistes ayant menés leur étude et publiés l’article en 2016. Autrement plus sérieux que ta … romancière 😂😂 https://t.co/epjjBlCTcz
@Cl4rky130 @MikeWel61647760 @JeremySinger1 There's plenty of experimentation going on, just not large scale. Here I am debunking the conspiracy theory & you're too stupid to realize it, thinking I'm am on side theorist. If you spend half a second rea
@HolyFukcmedead Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraft don't look like this (R)
@KrisJam57683800 @JeremySinger1 Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraft don't loo
RT @Freedom_Yeti: @Dan__Stevens Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ h…
@Dan__Stevens Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraft don't look like this (R) Th
RT @Freedom_Yeti: @jeff29935001 Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ h…
RT @Freedom_Yeti: @jeff29935001 Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ h…
@jeff29935001 Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraft don't look like this (R) Th
@Dan__Stevens Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraft don't look like this (R) Th
@ReasonOverDogma Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraft don't look like this (R)
@NullusPax Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraft don't look like this (R) This
@DanaMetcalfe5 Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraft don't look like this (R) T
@Tinkerb65712648 Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraft don't look like this (R)
@jeff29935001 Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraft don't look like this (R) Th
@GeoeWatchDebunk @peterconet8 He completely ignores science and goes on and on about the conspiracy theory. https://t.co/I8oWJ2pzzW
@peterconet1 @germor53 @iluminatibot Science not fear mongering. Contrails =/= Chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraft don't
RT @Freedom_Yeti: @MarkFriesen08 We've been through this... Science not fear mongering. https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ…
Contrails =/= Chemtrails; Science not fear mongering. https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraft don't look like this (R) This is why there
@MarkFriesen08 We've been through this... Science not fear mongering. https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/jpuupbmzVJ https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t (Journal) https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg (L) Passenger aircraft don't look like this (R) T
@Stephen10626376 Contrails =/= Chemtrails https://t.co/2DrpAuks3Y https://t.co/HiDop2u8Cg https://t.co/XczDGM5oR2 https://t.co/d8qVFgz72t
@MarkFriesen08 @PremierScottMoe Here's an article referring to a panel of experts. Sure always be wary of experts these days, however... these experts come with science. https://t.co/8Z4sHUtaE3 Scientific Journal linked in the article. https://t.co/d
@tyler64000 @RammsteinLinda @ghislain_denis @franceinter Voici l'étude de 4 chercheurs qui démontent un par un les arguments des complotistes du chemtrail en interrogeant 77 spécialistes. Je vous préviens, c'est en anglais mais je n'ai rien à ajouter, tout
Merdeils, massa avió. Que interessant seria veure que passa amb tot això parat un cert temps.
@MiSuri82116153 @Maria_Msl_ Llegiu l’informe aquest que van fer el 2016 Christine Shearer i Steven J. Davis, de la Universitat de Califòrnia amb la col.laboració de 77 científics més i veureu a les conclusions que arriben … 🤗 https://t.co/L9MRG64nqs
Va si us plau, una mica d'ordre (al cel) ! avui, molt ratllats! https://t.co/KP3mohWnrL https://t.co/S17tIIauZP https://t.co/3WbaxsNYX8 El Prat de Llobregat, avui 10 h: https://t.co/sEPb1bIQZR
@Alego20_sc5 @politonno @sapobufo86 @doricojonico @titotatatz @Pajadawan89 @orange_thunder4 @SanyagoMoral @Edu_Nividhia Tampoco aportas pruebas científicas de que los chemtrails se usan en geoingenieria y no tienes probrema en afirmarlo. A pesar de estar m
https://t.co/wAMAFBXSuJ "...76 of the 77 scientists (98.7%) that took part in this study said they had not encountered evidence...and that the data cited as evidence could be explained through...well-understood physics and chemistry associated with aircraf
@strongroots61 https://t.co/wAMAFBYqkh ...76 of the 77 scientists (98.7%) that took part in this study said they had not encountered evidence...and that the data cited as evidence could be explained through...well-understood physics and chemistry associate
RT @Placeb0Mad: @Yo_soy_JulyR @AEMET_Esp No, de hecho pienso que se las han ganado. https://t.co/EjTXUniF4e
@karmagitya @MarkNelsenKPTV @CindyTyree12 @irmagerdiful @MsAreeka A physicist can be stupid as well. Here's an article by scientists who actually know what they're talking about https://t.co/JSAO0GYlVM
RT @Placeb0Mad: @AEMET_Esp Este es el famoso "paper" al que hace referencia AEMET para afirmar, prácticamente, que somos unos magufos(basta…
RT @Placeb0Mad: @AEMET_Esp Este es el famoso "paper" al que hace referencia AEMET para afirmar, prácticamente, que somos unos magufos(basta…
@Yo_soy_JulyR @AEMET_Esp No, de hecho pienso que se las han ganado. https://t.co/EjTXUniF4e
@WitQwik @CryptoReapa @ronin19217435 https://t.co/5ofn6JOjTR i tried to search for the jetfuel contents and i was wrong, its gasoline based. i have no idea when and how i got the misconception that planes run on hydrogen, i must have confused them with lik
LaCiencia©, de nuevo, pero ahora con las fumigaciones químicas de #Geoingeniería. "Consenso científico" 77 "científicos" y un paper. https://t.co/mEULXR32gz
@AEMET_Esp Este es el famoso "paper" al que hace referencia AEMET para afirmar, prácticamente, que somos unos magufos(basta con mirar un rato el cielo y ver cómo deshacen nubes con esas "estelas de vapor y partículas") aunque nadie sepa de donde procede es
@2Justuciero @evitacensurada Más... y así hasta aburrir https://t.co/apaZGv02o6
@ElGruffalo1 Pues aquí tienes el estudio. https://t.co/HHYcF7FsXN
RT @MickWest: I do actually have my name on one peer-reviewed paper. One of the more popular ones in the world. I mostly helped with curati…
RT @MickWest: I do actually have my name on one peer-reviewed paper. One of the more popular ones in the world. I mostly helped with curati…