@LeighAnnWoolley @EuanRitchie1 @martinrev21 @Mr_Spock Link to the above source: https://t.co/wRMzfYjQ0n
@WvSchaik @BioMickWatson Well, all of animal Ag in most developed countries emits approx 4% of GHG. This number holds true for North America and most European Countries. If you we to go vegan for one year, that would equate to the GHG if one transatlantic
RT @jameswoudhuysen: MASSACRE OF THE INNOCENTS DEPT: in 2008, Oregon scientists, targeting adolescents (NB!), say a US child & its progeny…
The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/FTiPv0cmw7 via @IOPscience
MASSACRE OF THE INNOCENTS DEPT: in 2008, Oregon scientists, targeting adolescents (NB!), say a US child & its progeny = 5.7x Ma’s lifetime CO2 https://t.co/Vd0QRbiHo2 2017, Canadian scientists add that a child = 58.6 tonnes CO2 https://t.co/r1lJLoYjMF.
RT @andremoraespv: @juslvs Para as pessoas que acham isso loucura, levando em conta apenas o aspecto de redução de emissão de gases não ter…
@juslvs Para as pessoas que acham isso loucura, levando em conta apenas o aspecto de redução de emissão de gases não ter filhos já ajuda e muito. https://t.co/X5FkmV79KP
@officialDB3K One of the best things we can actually do for the planet is have less children https://t.co/0Med96cnwQ
For US, deciding to have a child has the same climate impact as about 100 transatlantic flights PER YEAR. But nobody likes to talk about the elephant...er...toddler in the room. https://t.co/91YSL7U9lo
@fortysevey Not all personal action is equal, see: https://t.co/xjHbCV6Rio But we need a change in our consumerist society. That change needs buy in from the citizens. And the higher powers.
“Current anthropogenic climate change is the result of greenhouse gas accumulation in the atmosphere, which records the aggregation of billions of individual decisions. Here we consider a broad range of individual... https://t.co/vftpkxrjAw
RT @hukl: If that worries you a little bit - read this article: https://t.co/6vayMjQkky Spoiler: Less humans and less long distance flight…
@DiogenePere Alors c'est marrant parce que les auteurs de cette tribune citent justement en référence un article signé par un géographe. https://t.co/Ce2OKzKQeG Mais j'avoue que je connais peu la littérature sur ce sujet.
@Gattinov Je ne suis pas sûr de comprendre : vous trouvez qu'on n'est pas assez nombreux « chez nous », ou vous pensez que les auteurs ne parlent que des pays émergents ? Si c'est ça vous vous trompez, cette recommandation est basée sur : https://t.co/Ce2O
RT @meelijane: #TIL that most of what people talk about in terms of reducing carbon emissions is completely hilariously ridiculously low im…
RT @meelijane: #TIL that most of what people talk about in terms of reducing carbon emissions is completely hilariously ridiculously low im…
RT @meelijane: #TIL that most of what people talk about in terms of reducing carbon emissions is completely hilariously ridiculously low im…
#TIL that most of what people talk about in terms of reducing carbon emissions is completely hilariously ridiculously low impact compared to just not having kids. https://t.co/U53C3ShYmI https://t.co/2FmDp7Y1ke
@AnnieLeymarie @civiltalker @patrickthomson Absolutely. And it's too late for some of us… That ERL paper puts things into perspective. You can read it here (though probably paywalled). https://t.co/AlfuuEiVgF
RT @PEPANZ_CEO: With submissions soon due on our "Zero Carbon Bill", I enjoyed reading this @IOPPublishing piece (https://t.co/FgxLLnR6Gj)…
RT @PEPANZ_CEO: With submissions soon due on our "Zero Carbon Bill", I enjoyed reading this @IOPPublishing piece (https://t.co/FgxLLnR6Gj)…
RT @PEPANZ_CEO: With submissions soon due on our "Zero Carbon Bill", I enjoyed reading this @IOPPublishing piece (https://t.co/FgxLLnR6Gj)…
With submissions soon due on our "Zero Carbon Bill", I enjoyed reading this @IOPPublishing piece (https://t.co/FgxLLnR6Gj) on the most effective actions each of us can take as individuals to #LowerEmissions. If you're time poor, the info-graphic below giv
@farmgeek Apparently one study thus far, question is, I don’t think it is a UN study, correct me if I’m wrong https://t.co/WFVOwt6b8d
Principales formas de reducir tu huella de carbono: 1. No tener hijos (58.6 ton CO2eq c/u al año) 2. No tener automóvil (2.4 ton CO2eq/año) 3. Evitar un vuelo transatlántico (1.6 ton CO2eq/año) Fuente: https://t.co/gsDMuIpO87 https://t.co/FPfq2HlZ3y
RT @zozototozozo: @AudreyPulvar Il faut que vous supprimiez tous le gaspillage alimentaire pendant au moins quatre ans pour avoir autant d'…
@AudreyPulvar Il faut que vous supprimiez tous le gaspillage alimentaire pendant au moins quatre ans pour avoir autant d'impact qu'en supprimant un seul trajet aller en avion en afrique. source: https://t.co/9uVuiSGYmC 3/4
@AndreaLearned @IPCC_CH The magazine piece being referenced is here: https://t.co/M2ry9xIs1f The original piece of research is open-access and available here: https://t.co/CLie4E9Ux8 Thanks for your efforts, Andrea!
@shanahanmike Not the best carbon footprint calculator as it seems to miss of the individual choice that has the biggest impact https://t.co/WG7veQXxhj
@jrmjones @AnthonyBentley7 @AndrewFoghorn @worldlandtrust This is reasearch by Wynes & @KA_Nicholas | https://t.co/TdCQiSa76E . A plant based / vegetarian / vegan diet is relevant. So too is driving less and flying less. https://t.co/JBGKc14Uj8
@RippleCreekNW @fleroy1974 In the interests of balance: "4 recommended actions that are of substantial magnitude throughout the developed world [are] having one fewer child, living car free, avoiding air travel and eating a plant-based diet. Each of these
RT @wudanyan: But it's taken adapted from this paper: https://t.co/UZpel0X5MM which displays a similar chart... but with an extra bar.
But it's taken adapted from this paper: https://t.co/UZpel0X5MM which displays a similar chart... but with an extra bar.
@tracy__e @puddleg @fleroy1974 @thebiggrog @GHGGuru @drsplace No, and I didn't get that from the Guardian. https://t.co/5RGFmKeKGx
The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/4vip0OGye8 via @IOPscience
The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions - IOPscience https://t.co/6xNa4GHuKC
@awright4645 @LindsayCoyle The single biggest way is not producing new humans: https://t.co/38274OPARh
@mbabco @fleroy1974 @GHGGuru It's not an either/or. You can avoid meat and air travel. That's what I do. Both are effective means of reducing your carbon footprint, as highlighted below. Also, avoiding meat helps mitigate far more environmental impacts tha
@howemill @TheHillsCountry @RosewoodFarms @FarmerBeary NB: "4 recommended actions that are of substantial magnitude throughout the developed world [are] having one fewer child, living car free, avoiding air travel and eating a plant-based diet. Each of the
Discussion today led by UTS staff: The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/sA38hPsEya via @IOPscience
@EsTresidder @thatsamoray @Zapaman The High Impact Actions paper by @WynesSeth & @KA_Nicholas assigns "buy green energy" as basically zero impact in the UK, unfortunately, because of problems with double counting. https://t.co/ZUw1N9Y1Xv https://t.co/G
Interesting academic article from 2017 on the gap between reality vs what's taught about individual actions to tackle global warming (not an endorsement of the actions, many are highly personal decisions): https://t.co/4pcoNB7aCv
Basically - you all need to have fewer kids. The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/RW8lPNQF6g
@BioMickWatson @sciencemagazine This is the conclusion of the original paper. https://t.co/L5F0JX7ky0 https://t.co/W18MNYmyrd
RT @tanonev: @jilliannicola @littlehux @UrsulaV Put bluntly, even thinking about straws at all is penny-wise and pound-foolish. Here are th…
RT @tanonev: @jilliannicola @littlehux @UrsulaV Put bluntly, even thinking about straws at all is penny-wise and pound-foolish. Here are th…
Here's the article that made headlines: https://t.co/3KD48BX2H2
@jilliannicola @littlehux @UrsulaV Put bluntly, even thinking about straws at all is penny-wise and pound-foolish. Here are the highest-impact things we can do as individuals to reduce our own impact on the environment: https://t.co/Mr2Wb4pdI1
@DominicTristram @Zapaman @GreenVipul The study analysed data from 39 peer-reviewed articles, carbon calculators and government sources to quantify the most high-impact personal lifestyle choices in developed countries. Study here: https://t.co/80zyBVYqP
@AndrewFoghorn @TimAllwood @sconebirding @brettyebrant @antsbenn @SouthYareBirds @SteveCJjones @LeeEvansBirding @GrafhamWBirder @GretaThunberg It depends on how much meat you eat and how much you drive, type of car etc This is from recent research on most
RT @ebcripps: For a useful reminder of the biggest lifestyle changes needed to reduce GHG emissions, try: https://t.co/urYeRwLj9a
For a useful reminder of the biggest lifestyle changes needed to reduce GHG emissions, try: https://t.co/urYeRwLj9a
@Rafa_Font No es el mío en particular, sino el del humano medio. Más aquí: https://t.co/Cs0Dn3eTYH
@cyberco No. A child born to the, rich, western societies has that footprint and it's not per annum. The vast majority of the 1.9 billion children have tiny footprints. https://t.co/Xo3cFFdu7L
RT @centinel5051: @Midietacojea ¿Cuál es la fuente de información de esa afirmación? En este estudio hay otras decisiones por delante: http…
RT @centinel5051: @Midietacojea ¿Cuál es la fuente de información de esa afirmación? En este estudio hay otras decisiones por delante: http…
RT @centinel5051: @Midietacojea ¿Cuál es la fuente de información de esa afirmación? En este estudio hay otras decisiones por delante: http…
RT @centinel5051: @Midietacojea ¿Cuál es la fuente de información de esa afirmación? En este estudio hay otras decisiones por delante: http…
Serving as a "reminder" to the populace on anthropegenic climate change this #WorldEnvironmentDay: https://t.co/8fPXVibqNf https://t.co/DIpWbpQqBp
RT @centinel5051: @Midietacojea ¿Cuál es la fuente de información de esa afirmación? En este estudio hay otras decisiones por delante: http…
RT @centinel5051: @Midietacojea ¿Cuál es la fuente de información de esa afirmación? En este estudio hay otras decisiones por delante: http…
@Midietacojea ¿Cuál es la fuente de información de esa afirmación? En este estudio hay otras decisiones por delante: https://t.co/2xPRS33urT https://t.co/vDD4ouTlJ4
@static_errtic @bunhearts You’re completely misrepresenting our POV 😊 we’re not blaming over population for global warming at all 😊 just supporting a personal ethical choice with a fact backed by science 😊 reading comprehension 😊 https://t.co/6wHvWzDXoN
Hoy el foco está en el medio ambiente.#worldenvironmentday The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/csxBHqOgUk https://t.co/h8ImWffv6P
industrial pollution IS to blame, not because of what we believe, but because science. I said having a child is the most negatively impactful choice /an individual/ can make, not to shift blame or to be “edgy” but again, because science: https://t.co/KBJ
RT @LetsFishSmarter: Your first question should be "how did they calculate this?" Here we go. Start at the paper: https://t.co/5Pq17LiDJD a…
But we know that's not true. Climate researchers published a study in 2017 that looks at individual actions to curb emissions. https://t.co/UZpel0X5MM
De plus, se focaliser sur les animaux de compagnie pour réduire son empreinte carbone n'a pas grand sens, puisqu'aucune des actions à fort, moyen ou faible impact pour réduire ses émissions individuelles de gaz à effet de serre ne les concerne: https://t
RT @toddntucker: This study compares individual actions that would reduce carbon emissions to recommendations in government documents:. Two…
@jotaelegeese @saavedrautman @rodrigoulloa https://t.co/WHn5ZaxfDA Evitar los viajes en avión y tener una dieta basada en vegetales se plantea más efectivo para reducir las emisiones de CO2 que producen el calentamiento global, que otras recomendaciones me
@huubfransen @GHGGuru @MichaelEMann "We recommend 4 widely applicable high-impact actions with the potential to contribute to systemic change and substantially reduce annual personal emissions: having one fewer child, living car-free, avoiding airplane tra
finally on the deck as a topic, education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual action there is to increase a sustainable life on this planet. https://t.co/wvGhhlr6dc
Journal article on the things you can do as an individual to appreciably reduce your carbon footprint: https://t.co/8L6D197NTr Top 4? 1. Have 1 less kid 2. Go car free 3. Fly less (quickly takes 2nd place if you fly a lot) 4. Eat plant diet
The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual action- having less children ! https://t.co/0qczGGSY98
RT @toddntucker: This study compares individual actions that would reduce carbon emissions to recommendations in government documents:. Two…
Thread
Noteworthy for @CCF_Families
This study compares individual actions that would reduce carbon emissions to recommendations in government documents:. Two of top four actions not found in any country document studied: have fewer children and eat a plant-based diet. https://t.co/TIy89e7sM
Wow give this a read!!!! #Thanoswasright (for the Marvel fans) 😎
RT @nacho_kai: @ayelenoliva Tener menos hijos, usar energías renovables, menos transporte automotor y una dieta a base de plantas son los m…
@Pabloslaw @ayelenoliva Sé lo que la evidencia hasta el momento nos dice, por eso digo que hay que informarse, por ahí creyendo que se esta ayudando con algo en realidad no tiene un impacto importante. https://t.co/fC6jvK2Iub
@ayelenoliva Tener menos hijos, usar energías renovables, menos transporte automotor y una dieta a base de plantas son los métodos de mayor impacto, y lamentablemente no muy mencionados. https://t.co/fC6jvK2Iub
RT @KA_Nicholas: @iastruthers Thanks Iain! We analyzed 39 studies & carbon calculators w life cycle approach CO2e for high emitting countri…
RT @KA_Nicholas: @iastruthers Thanks Iain! We analyzed 39 studies & carbon calculators w life cycle approach CO2e for high emitting countri…
RT @KA_Nicholas: @iastruthers Thanks Iain! We analyzed 39 studies & carbon calculators w life cycle approach CO2e for high emitting countri…
@iastruthers Thanks Iain! We analyzed 39 studies & carbon calculators w life cycle approach CO2e for high emitting countries. Found on avg a RT transatlantic flight = 8 months of driving typical car (~1 yr for avg UK car). Anyway, agree ✈️pollute a lot
A transzparens egy kutatás eredményére utal (Wynes & Nicholas, 2017) https://t.co/sVk3F3X2CS https://t.co/Yr7XYO3fFZ
@antonioguterres @GretaThunberg Great idea to have #climateAction bot! But dissapointing to see so many low-impact actions like 💡 on your list. Our peer-reviewed study shows ✈️🚗🐮 free= personal choices that cut the most CO2 fast, but gov'ts don't name them
@markeewan @JoannaBlythman @zoeharcombe It's often overlooked, but that same study said that shifting to a plant-based diet was one of "four widely applicable high-impact actions" that would be "of substantial magnitude throughout the developed world". ht
RT @paraschopra: @docbhooshan I'm assuming @docbhooshan is referring to this study: https://t.co/75BkhpZ6NW https://t.co/xLJjAc2DLn
RT @paraschopra: @docbhooshan I'm assuming @docbhooshan is referring to this study: https://t.co/75BkhpZ6NW https://t.co/xLJjAc2DLn
RT @paraschopra: @docbhooshan I'm assuming @docbhooshan is referring to this study: https://t.co/75BkhpZ6NW https://t.co/xLJjAc2DLn
@docbhooshan I'm assuming @docbhooshan is referring to this study: https://t.co/75BkhpZ6NW https://t.co/xLJjAc2DLn
RT @alita_emo: Hay un estudio bien interesante y bien malinterpretado. Titulares y conclusiones rápidas y mal hechas del tipo "lo mejor par…