RT @SlashPingu: Não ter filho e não ter um carro são duas das ações mais efetivas que eu poderia tomar - no âmbito individual - para reduzi…

RT @SlashPingu: Não ter filho e não ter um carro são duas das ações mais efetivas que eu poderia tomar - no âmbito individual - para reduzi…

RT @SlashPingu: Não ter filho e não ter um carro são duas das ações mais efetivas que eu poderia tomar - no âmbito individual - para reduzi…

RT @SlashPingu: Não ter filho e não ter um carro são duas das ações mais efetivas que eu poderia tomar - no âmbito individual - para reduzi…

Fonte: https://t.co/HsruYcBgT8

Eu tô contribuindo tb

Não ter filho e não ter um carro são duas das ações mais efetivas que eu poderia tomar - no âmbito individual - para reduzir a emissão de CO2 no planeta. Mais do que ser vegetariano, por ex. (O que também seria um impacto relativamente grande.) Fonte: ht

Mantener una dieta basada en vegetales es la 6ª elemento que más impacto en las emisiones de CO2 (300–1600 Kg por año) a nivel individual https://t.co/csYGAzrbDr

RT @GabrielBotell20: Ahora se habla mucho sobre cátedras de cambio climático, sin embargo no se discute si estamos enseñando lo adecuado pa…

Ahora se habla mucho sobre cátedras de cambio climático, sin embargo no se discute si estamos enseñando lo adecuado para combatirlo. Al parecer no. https://t.co/Q472uLNwNr https://t.co/YkNLkHpGqo

RT @Karmageddon67: ..emission reductions per year), living car-free (2.4 tCO2e saved per year), avoiding airplane travel (1.6 tCO2e saved p…

@family_dare The original research is here: https://t.co/aXNETHl8ni

https://t.co/yVcdjoKJTF

It's about doing it the easy way vs the hard way. Easy way is to induce less reproduction voluntarily and thus less need for housing down line. A carbon credit system could achieve this more directly.

RT @BooreamFrancois: likely a carbon credit will need to be devised not just to preserve land/farm but also to pay ppl to not have kids. wo…

https://t.co/1xDLBHwOyt

RT @Karmageddon67: ..emission reductions per year), living car-free (2.4 tCO2e saved per year), avoiding airplane travel (1.6 tCO2e saved p…

likely a carbon credit will need to be devised not just to preserve land/farm but also to pay ppl to not have kids. would be controversial to say the least. suppose the top thinkers in this area have thought of it & just not ready to push the argument

RT @Karmageddon67: ..emission reductions per year), living car-free (2.4 tCO2e saved per year), avoiding airplane travel (1.6 tCO2e saved p…

RT @Karmageddon67: ..emission reductions per year), living car-free (2.4 tCO2e saved per year), avoiding airplane travel (1.6 tCO2e saved p…

RT @Karmageddon67: ..emission reductions per year), living car-free (2.4 tCO2e saved per year), avoiding airplane travel (1.6 tCO2e saved p…

..emission reductions per year), living car-free (2.4 tCO2e saved per year), avoiding airplane travel (1.6 tCO2e saved per roundtrip transatlantic flight) and eating a plant-based diet (0.8 tCO2e saved per year).” https://t.co/cpoJ26g6E9

@LynnBrittney2 It would be a lot worse if they eventually have their way. 1.https://t.co/fdYQhBbk22 2.UN Agenda For Global Education. This is what will replace the CRT revolution in your public school textbooks. https://t.co/IbAIVO5zWd

RT @berilsirmacek: Eat #plantbased if you want to stop our #extinction. #FridaysForFuture #climatecrisis #globalwarming Research page: h…

Eat #plantbased if you want to stop our #extinction. #FridaysForFuture #climatecrisis #globalwarming Research page: https://t.co/NAciFHBLTn

Wynes & Nicholas of Lund University investigated top high impact actions to reduce individual greenhouse gas emissions, including: 1) living car free 2) avoiding airplane travel 3) eating a plant based diet (paper from 2017) https://t.co/ZllcwHO1EL

Ganz dünnes Eis.....

@OdendahlC Was ist daran nonsense? "Wer kinderlos bleibt, tut etwas fürs Klima" ist doch eine wahre Aussage. https://t.co/iH1IbeO2qK

@buitengebieden_ The most important thing we can do to save our planet is to have one less child. The study did not ask what benefit would derive from having one less pet; but logically, the impact would be huge. Why does Hailey have 4 dogs? https://t.c

@oswinner https://t.co/bZty3TViv6

@Dr_Yes_ Quelle: Wynes, S., Nicholas, K.A. (2017): The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environmental Research Letters, 12(7). https://t.co/50r0TwjBI5

@villawasp @vegix It really just is. And it's more realistic for many than not having kids, not having a car, or buying an electric car. You can either educate yourself or remain ignorant... your choice. https://t.co/4VeOL0ozoi

@BCharmer Here's the citation, for your future use 😉 The climate mitigation gap Seth Wynes and Kimberly A Nicholas Published 12 July 2017 • © 2017 IOP Publishing Ltd Environmental Research Letters, Volume 12, Number 7 https://t.co/aIwHQzfjR8

@genosse_kim @JoePolit Dazu gibt es übrigens auch Studien, die zeigen dass es wohl doch sinnvoller ist keine Kinder zu gebären als Maßnahmen wie Veganismus etc und wie gesagt für Veganismus kann man auch ohne Kinder werben https://t.co/usiZ2ZZ8VE https://

@_anarkitty_ @KamNoNym https://t.co/usiZ2ZZ8VE https://t.co/ESmwUAelFq https://t.co/Yzg8TxCVGM

@AlexSteffen @djspratt The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/e1MJLoPpdw

@john_cantelo @simonzebf1 https://t.co/6REYuCyA0S

Hey @elonmusk should developed countries stop having children because the carbon footprint of a child is roughly 58.6 metric tonnes annually? https://t.co/kglKPMwV5U

https://t.co/9nCJrOHW2T

The study, published in Environmental Research Letters, found having one fewer child than planned could reduce carbon emissions for each parent by 58 tonnes for each year of their life. That is A LOT! https://t.co/Qe4cCYrUTb (c)

میپرسین ربط تغییرات اقلیمی که میگن همش زیر سر سرمایه‌داریِ خبیثه با بچه‌دار شدن چیه؟ این مقاله معروف بررسی کرده مصرف‌کننده‌ی «غربی» چطور میتونه ردپای کربنش رو کم کنه. همونطور که در جدول میبینین تاثیر بچه از ماشین/هواپیما سوار نشدن و گیاهخواری خیلی بیشتره.

@JoelMCurzon Here's a reference if that helps anyone. https://t.co/EXqWAOOo4r

The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/RWDgIOGBcS via @IOPscience

Chequen este estudio del 2017 publicado en Environmental Research Letters, también les dejo una gráfica publicada en El País https://t.co/YunHPgGz3M https://t.co/u1P4HxRcms

@Dan_Althouse @altusda Hi Dan, our research in 2017 found lifecycle emissions of electric cars with current grids was about half a conventional gas car. This will further improve as electricity decarbonizes. But we need to reduce car dependence to meet cli

RT @KA_Nicholas: @TeddyWardSF @AkshatRathi I love Drawdown! But must consider scale. Food waste is a globally important climate solution, b…

@TeddyWardSF @AkshatRathi I love Drawdown! But must consider scale. Food waste is a globally important climate solution, but for individuals, we found it would save twice as much climate pollution to switch to a plant-based diet as it would to eliminate pe

RT @MichaelIreton: @ezraklein Maybe we SHOULD. Reducing air travel is one of the biggest things individuals can do. https://t.co/wI2iaPA91M

Here's Irvine's study: https://t.co/JJazUc5txB and here's "The Climate Mitigation Gap" https://t.co/eMl8W1uI4F

@ezraklein Maybe we SHOULD. Reducing air travel is one of the biggest things individuals can do. https://t.co/wI2iaPA91M

日本国民の年間CO2排出量の2017年平均は1人当たり9.31トンでした。世界の平均は約5トンです。 排出量実質ゼロの許容上限は2トン。英国物理学会によると、これは（１）自動車を持たない（２）飛行機に乗らない（３）肉を食べない（４）節電・節ガスの4つの行動で達成できます。https://t.co/qopbUG0caI

@JEverettLearned @Jeto314 @Anne_Mottet @FAOLivestock @ScienceMagazine You hit the mail on the hat @JEverettLearned. Food makes up a small portion of a person’s footprint, as this paper shows. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8

@stfn_mangini @JEverettLearned @aimableuw @fattoquotidiano Not true. Please read the following. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8

@epicurious How about reducing international flights, creating green energy cars and public transport and having less kids? Much more effective re help to environment! https://t.co/tmj6fyHAVh https://t.co/TYHoRuF4yh

@Jillpdx @nytimes Source? https://t.co/56ZJ9OY9iH

RT @dardenne_emilie: @JMLEKOALA En effet ! Selon cette étude suédoise, c'est même très impactant : https://t.co/gMlb9XGT3l

RT @dardenne_emilie: @maiden_rainger @FlorenceDell Il est vrai que d'autres études pointent d'autres actions individuelles impactantes : ne…

@JMLEKOALA En effet ! Selon cette étude suédoise, c'est même très impactant : https://t.co/gMlb9XGT3l

@maiden_rainger @FlorenceDell Il est vrai que d'autres études pointent d'autres actions individuelles impactantes : ne plus avoir de voiture, faire moins d'enfants. L'adoption d'un régime davantage végétal y reste bien classée. Voir par exemple :https://t

では、何をすべきでしょうか？ 以下論文からの引用ですが、簡単にいうと、 子供を産まない（影響度ダントツなのでmust) そして、車、飛行機に乗らずに、肉を食わない生活 これをやっておけばimpact的にはかなり大きいはずです （ただ、修行僧感あって、辛いですよね。。。） https://t.co/84vZt0rY2b https://t.co/WWZ3tuoE5u

@vengeant101 No. Recycling doesn't rock any boats so government sponsored educational materials tend prefer talking about it. The big things like "avoid flying, driving, and eating meat" all threaten major industries. https://t.co/03kIrHqxjI

For Earth Day I was going to post about the various things I’m doing to reduce my personal carbon footprint (one day I’ll tick that last box, damn bacon). https://t.co/OXjN5cmxX2 But actually, the individualised Carbon Footprint is something BP promoted t

@nicole_mcheinz @herbivore_club I haven't looked into the numbers in a while, was there a flaw discovered in the methodology of this study? https://t.co/JGRzM9OSRW

@STOPHEATHERTIME source: https://t.co/NqRcEXAk6U

이 연구 발행된지가 2017년으로 거슬러 올라가는데 온실가스를 어떻게 줄일가에 대한 컨센서스도 없는 마당에 어떻게 애하나 덜낳는게 큰 효과가 되는거지, 나도 대가리 막굴리면(?) 이런 결과가 그나라에 출산율 높은 소수인종 집단을 겨냥 하게 될거라고 말해도 되겠네 https://t.co/zDOuqd7FCx

@iratesheep @openclosedundee @SarahJ_Berry @AxleRyde I have found the source, cited in this article: https://t.co/nMoq0BM49b "For the action 'have one fewer child,' we relied on a study which quantified future emissions of descendants based on historical r

@fhuttel https://t.co/7R5G3JvP63 “ In this approach, half of a child's emissions are assigned to each parent, as well as one quarter of that child's offspring (the grandchildren) and so forth.”

Which in turn refers this 2017 paper 'The Climate Mitigation Gap: Education and Government Recommendations vs. Effective Individual Actions' by Wynes and Nicholas https://t.co/Topcv1aqgn via Phys dot org https://t.co/Ct9DkdhDEQ

https://t.co/8VJKnjNOdl

@kudrakarma @scottsantens @davidmiller Having just one less child is far and away the most impactfull action that a US family can take to reduce carbon emissions. (The impact of this action is so large the scale of the graph must be broken so that other le

@GT270913 @sdbernard @jburnmurdoch @IpsosMORI Nope. It is then adjusted to show the average emissions reduction this would equate to per year. More here: https://t.co/lk8He26ac4

@sdbernard @C_BruceLockhart @IpsosMORI Thank you for this interesting analysis for @FT using data from 2017 study by @WynesSeth & me! Original study: https://t.co/vTTheCdse7 Seth’s new study also showing people don’t know which climate actions are hig

MANJE DECE - ZDRAVIJA PLANETA?! Da li će teorije skandinavskih ekologa koje lede krv u žilama promeniti strukturu porodice.A i original link https://t.co/FkX2qgGQyX https://t.co/Lh3cWc42l4

عندما يكون لديك طفل واحد اقل فإن ذلك يقلل من الانبعاث الكربوني بمقدار 54.6 طن سنويا The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/bTKizZZbGm via @IOPscience

Having one fewer child prevents 58.6 tons of carbon emissions every year. #ActOnClimate #ZPG #ClimateAction https://t.co/TPAxWQYKyi

Commonly promoted #environmental and #greenhousegas reduction #strategies like comprehensive recycling are less effective than #plantbased diet Peer-reviewed journal: https://t.co/NAciFHBLTn

All I got was 404 & site not found messages when I drilled down to reach the data. Useless! - For those who actually want to be properly informed about top actions which they can take on an individual level ... https://t.co/ngPNfrNR0v https://t.co/5BCT

@CarlosECorreaE Salvar el planeta es más de tomar decisiones individuales efectivas basadas en información que en opiniones. Aquí algunas recomendaciones, normalmente no incentivadas por los gobiernos, para lograr un planeta más sostenible 👇 https://t.co/e

Want laten we eens kijken waar Philip Huff zich op baseert. Nou, dit onderzoek van de Universiteit van Lund, Zweden: https://t.co/it4UCw8hLN. Maar kijk even goed: dit onderzoek leunt op een ander onderzoek uit 2009, namelijk dat van Murtaugh and Schlax: /2

The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/6jGXBViIFp via @IOPscience

@wendyg @HarvardHBS @AriellaKristal @ashleywhillans Hi Wendy, that's why @WynesSeth & I recommend going #carfree as a high-impact climate action in our study compiling 148 scenarios from 39 studies and carbon calculators! https://t.co/vTTheCv3CH

Having one fewer child on average reduces by 58.6 tonnes CO2 emissions per year in Western Countries. Per study discussed: 👉 The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions - IOPscience - h

@martinparlasca @KCTait @westernpoultry 0.8 t CO2e - switch to plant based diet. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8 https://t.co/cOcQPjxPLv

RT @WelsomeSocial: How our actions impact our carbon emissions. A comparison referenced from - https://t.co/vGgfgHqeXp Generally ranked by…

@GregVidua @BakaKarasu @Phytophilia1 It's from a 2017 study which raised criticism (e.g. see published comments) https://t.co/BOrsKryxRG. There are many other relevant studies, incl. extensive work from Project Drawdown showing 3 top solutions to address t

RT @WelsomeSocial: @how2saveaplanet @DrKWilkinson @ecotone2 @steviedubyu This is exactly what we have been looking for! Welsome is a platfo…

How our actions impact our carbon emissions. A comparison referenced from - https://t.co/vGgfgHqeXp Generally ranked by highest impact! - Have fewer children or adopt - Live car-free - Avoid being on one flight - Buy green energy - Buy a more efficient c

@how2saveaplanet @DrKWilkinson @ecotone2 @steviedubyu This is exactly what we have been looking for! Welsome is a platform to recommend people the actions which bring the most impact - so we may use some of these tips as activities on the app! Thanks a lot

We surely know this! However, one of THE most important papers https://t.co/smrWyAhUgl @WynesSeth & Kimberly Nicholas 2017 @jonathonporritt

@nedopechen Ево оригинал, објављено: https://t.co/UZeV1iXbyM Реко би чоек шала смијех млади пјесма зајебанција, ал бојим се да није, аутор је као онај смарач који се повремено појави испред драгстора (некад било) и попије пола пива а нама свима непријатно

@climateloops Actually reading the original study now and it says "CO2-equivalent" which I assume means they calculated the methane emissions in as well. original study: https://t.co/zTI8fUQrLx

RT @GHGGuru: @MikeMgd001 @KayJohnsonSmith One transatlantic flight from the US to Europe, produces at least 1.6 tons of CO2e emissions per…

RT @GHGGuru: @MikeMgd001 @KayJohnsonSmith One transatlantic flight from the US to Europe, produces at least 1.6 tons of CO2e emissions per…

@MikeMgd001 @KayJohnsonSmith One transatlantic flight from the US to Europe, produces at least 1.6 tons of CO2e emissions per passenger. For comparison, going vegan for one year, saves 0.8 tons of CO2e. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8

El estudio del que toma los datos es bastante interesante (https://t.co/4FNXVL5bKV) pero comentarios como este dejan claro cuál es el objetivo del artículo de El País: culpabilizar a los pobres, que a duras penas sobreviven en el sistema, en lugar de a aqu

@mouneer no guarantees responsible parenting results in responsible citizen... or even healthy kid also https://t.co/EWuaMGBSVQ... https://t.co/gDsfKEb7ve https://t.co/weEBfxKTqA

@CRRESmodel @DrMarySD @WynesSeth @Riverford An introduction to this nuanced issue, yes. I think that's why the key take away is focusing on what you're eating rather than where it comes from? The original paper is here: https://t.co/RujeWhay3w

@AlexSibila Having fewer children according to this study https://t.co/fHfCW2v1c0

Link to a not so recent study regarding carbon footprint.Keep in mind that what you save is what you don't spend. Sadly decision makers are still not targeting the root of ecological problems: over-population. How much longer are we going to close our eyes

RT @doktorkampi: Anar a la feina a peu o en bici, canviar a una companyia de la llum 100% renovable com @SomEnergia o menjar més fruita i v…