RT @centinel5051: @pitiklinov https://t.co/2xPRS33urT https://t.co/tPgyd00UEU

@pitiklinov https://t.co/2xPRS33urT https://t.co/tPgyd00UEU

@HenriBontenbal Beste is geen kinderen te krijgen ... ... ... *dan een hele tijd niets* ... ... ... geen auto te bezitten (of eventueel elektrisch te rijden, liefst op groene energie), niet te vliegen, groene energie te gebruiken, en dan pas komt iets aan

@cfhinor @maxcordiez @AliceDesbiolles Erreur de lien, je voulais pointer l'étude de Seth Wynes et Kimberly A Nicholas : https://t.co/Nvz9B6sJak Aucune de ces propositions ne seront volontairement appliquées par la population (sauf p.ê arrêter l'avion) don

https://t.co/t1syEgzQp3

El cambio político para regular la industria y la producción tiene que comenzar YA. Y desde lo individual, no perdamos el foco: lo que más sirve es no comer carne, no tener auto, evitar los vuelos transatlánticos, y de ser posible tener 1 hijo menos 👇🏽

RT @johnwilander: @JeremiahLee This has been studied. Having one fewer child is estimated to reduce CO2 equivalent emissions 30 times as mu…

@JeremiahLee This has been studied. Having one fewer child is estimated to reduce CO2 equivalent emissions 30 times as much as living a car free life and was mentioned in 0 of the textbooks the study covered. https://t.co/qvoDcECPHv https://t.co/FVSqzccUc8

@TyotoRiffle @NYGovCuomo And do you know what the single worst action is in regards to enlarging one's carbon footprint? See Figure 1. https://t.co/7ZWUxsWedg Since it is science (social agendas don't matter), an ending of all natalist subsidies coupled

@CecileMichaut @CFroidevauxMett @MartinWinckler Assez étonné aussi, j'ai été regarder : il s'agit des émissions cumulées de toute la vie de l'enfant et de ses descendants, affectées par moitié aux parents et divisées par leur espérance de vie... https://t.

RT @kuroi234: CO2削減に寄与する行動、「産む子供の数を1人少なくする」が年58.6トンで圧倒的1位(2017年の記事) https://t.co/mbC3ijsYos https://t.co/4KBfYbuKZT https://t.co/ao3z20mFs8

@PattyMurray In the very least, Sen. Murray can come out against all existence and consumption subsidies and not only call for the end of all natalist subsidies but demand a per head carbon breeding tax. Science up until it hits one's social agenda. http

RT @marcoapostoli: @SteB777 @GeorgeMonbiot Not having children at all is *by far* the single individual available choice that most reduces…

@SteB777 @GeorgeMonbiot Not having children at all is *by far* the single individual available choice that most reduces the carbon footprint > https://t.co/r2oW7OTk3o + a meta-analysis on 39 governmental/scientific papers and 148 different international

RT @kuroi234: CO2削減に寄与する行動、「産む子供の数を1人少なくする」が年58.6トンで圧倒的1位(2017年の記事) https://t.co/mbC3ijsYos https://t.co/4KBfYbuKZT https://t.co/ao3z20mFs8

@nicktemple1 @mcneil_tom Of course, there are some academics who would argue you’ve already passed up the greatest opportunity to reduce carbon emissions...! https://t.co/oPmnMvC0DT

Según este interesante artículo, nuestras decisiones individuales pueden tener mayor impacto en la sostenibilidad, que las prácticas normalmente incentivadas por nuestros líderes. Invito a leer y adoptar comportamientos más sostenibles 👇 https://t.co/Kq9E8

@kathasallier @oeko_kalle @luke43517475 @schirmherrin Ist relativ aber siehe hier zb: https://t.co/ZLsUTP3mtf

RT @kuroi234: CO2削減に寄与する行動、「産む子供の数を1人少なくする」が年58.6トンで圧倒的1位(2017年の記事) https://t.co/mbC3ijsYos https://t.co/4KBfYbuKZT https://t.co/ao3z20mFs8

@babadookspinoza It's also complete rubbish bc wealth is way more influential wrt environmental impacts than population numbers. People like to cite this study for the population argument but fail to even read the abstract which clearly states WHAT populat

Czasem wystarczy tylko obrazek + link. Mądrej głowie dość dwie słowie: having one fewer child (an average for developed countries of 58.6 tonnes CO2-equivalent (tCO2e) emission reductions per year) za: https://t.co/e1MfhYY7MW https://t.co/9yfSsUagAS

The most effective individual actions to #reducecarbonemission https://t.co/bhaDhXrmhO https://t.co/RLvfNNHSKA

@gbdonart There are just so many choices that it would be hard to fill them all out in an infographic. Could make for an interesting interactive website though. Check out my past research here for a start https://t.co/Xq7YyEH2ZJ

@jennawadsworth Such a climate disaster too. Completely uncalled for when campaigning in just NC. https://t.co/ErmQTGRFQz

Source: https://t.co/ywNq4pGrH0

RT @EmmPont: D'où vient ce résultat ? D'une étude de 2017 qui cherche à synthétiser l'empreinte carbone des choix de vie https://t.co/wQgaC…

RT @EmmPont: D'où vient ce résultat ? D'une étude de 2017 qui cherche à synthétiser l'empreinte carbone des choix de vie https://t.co/wQgaC…

D'où vient ce résultat ? D'une étude de 2017 qui cherche à synthétiser l'empreinte carbone des choix de vie https://t.co/wQgaCrENnv Qui sur la question des enfants cite une seule et unique source, une étude de 2008 : https://t.co/f0hshAF0qK

It’s from the voluntary human extinction movement not biased at all

@RockySly9 @stillgray @animal_lover365 It's from the hoary website of the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (bottom of the page): https://t.co/54nO1EZh2r This is the research paper from which the data was pulled: https://t.co/hrydShtkw7

@maaljisa @drasibutramina @dannymndz @IreneAdler_lm Es sencillo: 1 persona produce la mitad de lo que dos personas. La contribución más grande que una persona puede hacer para el ambiente es no reproducirse. Pero sí hay un estudio: https://t.co/lxgk9Fr9rw

@unchimico @steviedubyu Couldn't agree more! But personal action can accelerate the process. By the way, they recently switched because aviation ↗️ and energy↘️. In the meanwhile, I found the reference to what I said before and it turns out it was actuall

En Wynes, & Nicholas 2017 https://t.co/csYGAzrbDr Muestran las acciones que puedes hacer para reducir tu impacto son: Tener menos niños es la primera (es lógico, no?), vivir sin coche, no volar y utilizar energía renovable https://t.co/6IbOHrV5N2

@thatsamoray @pauleastwd @SoEnergyUK @SpeakSarahSpeak I don’t think you’re out on a limb Jamie @WynesSeth and @KA_Nicholas assign basically zero carbon reduction to a renewable energy contract in the U.K. https://t.co/ZUw1N9Y1Xv https://t.co/1Dn5SGsqgf

RT @KimVesto: Den obekväma sanningen att skaffa biologiska barn är en av de värsta saker man kan göra klimatmässigt.

RT @KimVesto: Den obekväma sanningen att skaffa biologiska barn är en av de värsta saker man kan göra klimatmässigt. https://t.co/WccquqfOOF

RT @KimVesto: Den obekväma sanningen att skaffa biologiska barn är en av de värsta saker man kan göra klimatmässigt.

Den obekväma sanningen att skaffa biologiska barn är en av de värsta saker man kan göra klimatmässigt.

@KimVesto Inte äta kött sparar 0,8 ton CO2/år. Inte köra bil 1,6 ton CO2/år. Inte skaffa fem barn sparar utsläpp av 293,2 ton CO2/år. https://t.co/rrf3oCesCp

RT @GHGGuru: https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8

RT @GHGGuru: https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8

RT @GHGGuru: https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8

https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8

@Landwirt007 https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8

@piersforster @diana_nbd @CREDS_UK @PriestleyCentre Not so sure of the timeliness of the @BBC report. The underlying scientific publication in ERL is three year old https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8

Si no queréis hablar con ellos también podéis leer el paper que fundamenta el panel https://t.co/AWQnYiVUJi En fin que si queremos hacer #EducaciónAmbiental tenemos que informarnos bien.

@GeorgeMonbiot Overpopulation concern is not racism. Overconsumption concern is not leftism. The poor suffer and die in regions where the environmental effects of overconsumption are most severe. A solution must be found. https://t.co/UqLhLUU0nl

RT @TheDisproof: https://t.co/WtnyxKdZJl "having one fewer child (an average for developed countries of 58.6 tonnes CO2-equivalent (tCO2e)…

https://t.co/WtnyxKdZJl "having one fewer child (an average for developed countries of 58.6 tonnes CO2-equivalent (tCO2e) emission reductions per year)" Why did the study below ignore it: https://t.co/FZuvt1eRS8

RT @nerdphysicist: P.S. The author of the opinion piece already has 2 kids, so they've already done more damage to the environment than the…

@diana_nbd @IOPscience Great paper! It's good to see "no pets" included, but how about "no children" (or fewer)? A previous study had shown this to be, by a long way, the most significant action! I'm surprised family size isn't mentioned... (graph from htt

@cragcrest @ScienceNews Here is another take on typical eco footprints - derived from https://t.co/BOrsKryxRG https://t.co/yu1j2yPisR

@GeorgeMonbiot The US has a 40% unintended pregnancy rate. Impact is measured by multiplying consumption per capita by population. Population is half the equation whichever way you want to cut it. https://t.co/WtnyxKdZJl

@ScientistsX @GeorgeMonbiot Impact is measured by multiplying consumption per capita by population. Unintended pregnancy in rich countries (e.g. the US has a 40% unintended pregnancy rate) is probably the largest individual impact an individual can have i

@SouthwestAir Proudly flight-free for nearly two years. It’s one of the best personal ways to fight the climate crisis. Also way to avoid being in a flying can with contagious people. https://t.co/SgT4OfQpWn #Grounded4Climate

@digit_AI https://t.co/fHfCW2v1c0

@Russ8111 It’s actually the correct answer according to this study https://t.co/fHfCW2v1c0

@FutureIsTesla @teslainvernon According to this study, having one fewer child is one of the highest-impact actions a person can do to substantially reduce annual personal emissions (saving an average of 58.6 tons of CO2 emissions every year) https://t.co/f

@juliettelucie @mckinleaf Sure, I'm not saying individual interventions alone are enough, but not reproducing is by far the most impactful individual intervention: https://t.co/38274OPARh

@mckinleaf https://t.co/38274OPARh

@JaysonBarton2 @Donaldknottz @_camielise You wanna know what the results section of thay study did list as a individual behavior that had an impact on climate health? Eating a plant based diet! Here’s the link if you want to take the time: https://t.co/qy

RT @jamielsterling: These are the most high-impact actions you can take to reduce your emissions: eating a plant-based diet living car-free…

These are the most high-impact actions you can take to reduce your emissions: eating a plant-based diet living car-free avoiding airplane travel having one fewer child #ClimateAction https://t.co/LRrWYcKhya

@El_Pinta Presentazione generale di articolo scientifico di esempio https://t.co/r2oW7OTk3o + la relativa meta-analisi (in lettura integrale e aperta, fortunatamente) su 39 diversi paper governativi/scientifici e 148 vari scenari internazionali di sviluppo

@ombrerosse_ Lascia stare il lato più new age, che repelle anche me. Ecco invece la presentazione generale di un articolo https://t.co/l0FtuKZAqH + la relativa meta-analisi (in lettura aperta) su 39 paper governativi/scientifici e 148 scenari internazional

@leahstokes Hi Leah, I know it’s cynical. I have two kids myself. Still, I find it important to keep an eye on the facts. Here’s one of my favourite studies exploring the most effective measures to tackle climate change: https://t.co/1LEQBeZkf5 https://t.c

RT @Stfko_memero: @JoeNavea No es un tema que me fascine mucho así que no lo he estudiado, pero ésto me he topado jaja -pq debieras esteri…

RT @Stfko_memero: @JoeNavea No es un tema que me fascine mucho así que no lo he estudiado, pero ésto me he topado jaja -pq debieras esteri…

RT @Stfko_memero: @JoeNavea No es un tema que me fascine mucho así que no lo he estudiado, pero ésto me he topado jaja -pq debieras esteri…

RT @Stfko_memero: Dos de los papers más edgys que he leído jajajaja Ambos sobre temas medio ambientales

Dos de los papers más edgys que he leído jajajaja Ambos sobre temas medio ambientales

@JoeNavea No es un tema que me fascine mucho así que no lo he estudiado, pero ésto me he topado jaja -pq debieras esterilizarte y ser vegetariano [1]https://t.co/zJXuNyO7Cr -pq tus viajes de placer por el mundo hacen cagar al planeta [2]https://t.co/8ixp

RT @Antarcticacl: Una persona Vegetariana🥬 evita emisión de ~800kg/año de CO2-e contribuyendo a mitigar #CambioClimatico👏 Pero desafortunad…

RT @Antarcticacl: Una persona Vegetariana🥬 evita emisión de ~800kg/año de CO2-e contribuyendo a mitigar #CambioClimatico👏 Pero desafortunad…

@vickyhsmith Hi Vicky, please see analysis led by @WynesSeth for annual estimates of personal climate actions like living car-free. https://t.co/fYCrMM8P4R (FAQs and more here: https://t.co/U4I2eecR8s)

RT @Antarcticacl: Una persona Vegetariana🥬 evita emisión de ~800kg/año de CO2-e contribuyendo a mitigar #CambioClimatico👏 Pero desafortunad…

@FarmingUK Pure insanity to claim that ‘only’ being ‘a leading’ & not ‘the largest’ cause of the DESTRUCTION OF THE PLANET(!!!) is a victory for AnimalAg. 😳 Also Lund predates Oxford hence older data. Here are both: ‘the’ https://t.co/k24hDfTuco &

Most western countries have below replacement rates of fertility. And yet we see recommendations like "have fewer kids" to fight climate change https://t.co/UjXBq31FcL Literally throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

@michael_wiebe @ESYudkowsky https://t.co/ZEhC5FLbWX

@altonbrown Not at all. And canceling the flight because you are worried about climate changes is a good move too. https://t.co/ErmQTGRFQz #ClimateEmergency https://t.co/kumyGn3EUV

"The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions" https://t.co/LpnF33TThe • have one child less • live car-free • avoid air travel • eat a plant-based diet The rest (like switching lightbul

The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/lHFinYdUH3 via @IOPscience

@galatea128 @Nopanaden Se ha hecho, sí 😅 https://t.co/a9VikB1tfu

@Standard_Merch @MeganFaust667 @CrimZon_666 @ChurchofSatan Having more than a child is really harmful for the environment and society https://t.co/KPzpAKt5LB

Son datos y hay que darlos https://t.co/KUPrAcKopk https://t.co/liddJMJFAC

RT @dominicroser: 4/ What’s wrong this number? The number is from a study by @KA_Nicholas & @WynesSeth. The study asked a fantastic (and…

4/ What’s wrong this number? The number is from a study by @KA_Nicholas & @WynesSeth. The study asked a fantastic (and neglected) question. But, unfortunately, it answered the question in a bad way. https://t.co/XmKWzmL4kn

@QuayMatt This research supports the Omni's statement. Honest question...why do you feel the statement is stupid? Multiple lifestyle decisions can help the environment. FWIW my wife & I are both vegan, own an electric car, don't fly, & have no kids

RT @Brodo91: @repubblica È più disarmante il fatto che un giornale come il vostro non sappia che hanno ragione. Scelte personali quelle 4.…

@repubblica È più disarmante il fatto che un giornale come il vostro non sappia che hanno ragione. Scelte personali quelle 4. Ma vere e scientificamente confermate. https://t.co/sOOauK9m0f

RT @RojH123: @cll54836529 @GeorgeMonbiot @ElliotElinor According to recent Swedish study, you have done more than most thru your self-contr…

@cll54836529 @GeorgeMonbiot @ElliotElinor According to recent Swedish study, you have done more than most thru your self-control. On behalf of my (<replacement number) kids, who will inherit a stressed envirnmt: THANK YOU & THANK YOU again. If I c

@gordon_struth @pirntatonjim @PaulBMcGill @bwmilker @GeorgeMonbiot @guardian Not sure how to reconcile your claims with studies such as this one, though I could have missed something crucial. https://t.co/7xPLRmbsl3

RT @adamcorlett: Someone asked me yesterday: is having children (in the UK) bad for the planet? In 2017, having one fewer child was report…

@Yann_Ouche @Decathlon https://t.co/P788nFMtDA

@gtrdblt @Nain_Portekoi C’est probablement rien par rapport à l’objet acheté en lui-même. Vaut mieux moins consommer. Et le vrai combat c’est de ne pas prendre la voiture pour les trajets quotidien. Ça ça a un vrai impact sur les émissions de CO2. https://

Having two children is probably the best thing you can do for yourself, your partner, and for your future geriatric selves.

RT @adamcorlett: Someone asked me yesterday: is having children (in the UK) bad for the planet? In 2017, having one fewer child was report…

@PhillisKathy @kordezm @ALeighMP @MichaelEMann Hahaha mate, that's ignorance. Sit down and read this study: https://t.co/vhnDNbGJaC Then we can talk.

@howemill @RawCowsMilk @OldHallFm @SoilAssociation @EdDickson7 @farmer_richiet @MossgielFarm @GreenCityCoop @forestfarmdairy @CalfAtFootDairy @smilingtreefarm @ChathamsDairy @JoannaBlythman "4 recommended actions that are of substantial magnitude throughou