@GlobalEcoGuy Since Dr. Foley blocked me, here's just one important reference to question his assertions. https://t.co/WZ6IrtB5pH https://t.co/AHLyFw8ws4
@Helios_do Sources : https://t.co/K5xv1M0hvV https://t.co/b2qQH3W7rA https://t.co/VZK0sN34Sn ainsi que l'article original que vous reprenez : https://t.co/Sg4QQNOmN6
Dice la ONU si nos morimos o volvemos a vivir como en el paleolítico entonces habrá menos gases y se reproducirán mejor algunas mariposas.
@danyscht En este paper recomiendan 4 acciones para reducir la emisión de GEI: tener un hijo menos, no viajar en avión, no tener coche y basar la dieta en plantas. Evidencian que tienen muchísimo más impacto que el reciclaje y el uso de bombillas de bajo
Good articles about "overpopulation" and the role of industrialised nations: (1) https://t.co/Bs5jVx6DUt (2) https://t.co/8SQ416aDfB
We upgraded all the lightbulbs at the house yesterday. 😌
@Bovidiva @CREDS_UK Yes, I expect more serious background work by the @BBC. If indeed they are so concerned about personal actions on carbon emissions, here is a journal article. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/qzmRblvmHq via @IOPscience
Moltes gràcies participants 👏 📢 Comprar energia renovable és la mesura que estalvia més emissions, fins a 1,5 t CO2 eq. Consulta l'article https://t.co/I0TTlXzLZS El canvi a energia 100% renovable només requereix 5 minuts per la gestió telemàtica del nou
"...growing a child contributes to 58.6 metric tonnes of CO2 per year" The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/VA3UUUahJw via @IOPscience
Moltes gràcies participants 👏 📢 Comprar energia renovable és la mesura que estalvia més emissions, fins a 1,5 t CO2 eq. Consulta l'article https://t.co/I0TTlXzLZS El canvi a energia 100% renovable només requereix 5 minuts per la gestió telemàtica del no
RT @GHGGuru: @AGtodayblog @FarmFoodCareSK Here is the scientific paper on this stats: https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
RT @GHGGuru: @AGtodayblog @FarmFoodCareSK Here is the scientific paper on this stats: https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
@AGtodayblog @FarmFoodCareSK Here is the scientific paper on this stats: https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
@ariearieinfree @nkjemisin Part of it is locked in, but the part beyond that isn’t. It’s like the climate crisis. The sooner we start behaving like we are all in this together, the less misery and death there will be. Ironic that air travel spreads disease
Plus, the study he mentioned that said not having an extra child is the biggest thing you could do for the climate, was talking about wealthy people in rich countries, *not* subsistence farming families with eight kids! https://t.co/dsaGnRXlun
@MLiebreich @LiebreichAssoc @Costingtheearth @BBCRadio4 @SimonCalder @SustAviation @BBCJustinR Theres good science to back tackling personal excessive aviation prior to, and separately from, emission issues from dog ownership (which mainly concern meat). P
...und wenn man das Ganze mal ganz unemotional mit spitzem Bleistift durchrechnet...😱 #Klimakrise #Ziemiak https://t.co/CHNlyTukq0 https://t.co/Rjbu90rYeU
@RobertoPaura https://t.co/kyGwKbREAC + https://t.co/1V39Ol2Jwc I paragoni si fanno però tra enti paragonabili, non tra agenti differenti. Senza contare che chi adesso vive in sussistenza non vede l'ora di passare il più velocemente possibile al consumism
@Lupo55 Si quieren tomar medidas eficaces contra el calentamiento global, no tengan hijos, no viajen en avión, no compren coches y sean veganos. Si no, pueden seguir siendo hipócritas tranquilamente o incluso negar el calentamiento global. https://t.co/
@CarlosMaslaton @_JereZaca Igual, @_JereZaca, si querés tomar medidas realmente efectivas, reducí tu consumo de productos derivados de animales, viajá menos en avión, planeá tener menos hijos y viajar menos en coche. El reciclaje no es tan eficaz. https:/
@geistesgift Das stimmt so nicht, s. diese Studie zu den wirkungsvollsten Individualmaßnahmen für Klimaschutz. https://t.co/6qPstgIeJ3 Indiv. Aktionen haben systemische Auswirkungen und Vorbildwirkung. Das reicht natürlich nicht. Verstehe Deinen Frust. 🤝
@MikaelFogelholm @fleroy1974 @Genlearnman @NNC2020 @methodsnerd @DenaZera Surely, plant- vs animal based diets have a lower carbon footprint. However, going vegan for one year, leads to half the carbon footprint reduction as what one transatlantic flight
@Evin_Arian @RDeluquez No, no. Te estoy haciendo una analogía. Igual, es falso lo del transporte terrestre. https://t.co/GYjEwCKAJ9 https://t.co/1zRh4RBYfZ
RT @EnvMonash: Have one less child. Live car-free. Avoid aeroplane travel. Eat a #plantbased diet. 2017 study concludes these four actions…
Have one less child. Live car-free. Avoid aeroplane travel. Eat a #plantbased diet. 2017 study concludes these four actions reduce your #carbonfootprint most! Interested in reading the scientific paper? Check out https://t.co/90eFZrspYy (see "Abstract" fo
@rutherdan @keithalexander Yet there is research that shows that 'having a fewer child' is one of the best ways to protect the planet, but the resistance to discuss the topic seriously prevails... https://t.co/uUnwjVEVd7
@HuffPostCanada Population reduction to fight climate change could be beneficial if avoided-population were high consumers, high polluters: https://t.co/qnnWlFtT3y https://t.co/Xv8vPNvQjA https://t.co/oFfZJ83w0Z https://t.co/EwAyAicMNA
@cronicasdefauna Olvidas la media más efectiva. Como dice este artículo, siempre se deja de lado. https://t.co/JKRbwiWpcf https://t.co/4j4lwBhWYG
RT @MarkusVinnari: @minealist @SallaTuomivaara @NinaVNygren Iso ongelma on keskustelun ja toimenpiteiden pyöriminen väärien asioiden ympäri…
RT @ZuivelenKlimaat: Welke acties kan je ondernemen om je eigen CO2-voetafdruk te verlagen? Minder vlees eten of? Wist je dat een een keer…
RT @MarkusVinnari: @minealist @SallaTuomivaara @NinaVNygren Iso ongelma on keskustelun ja toimenpiteiden pyöriminen väärien asioiden ympäri…
@minealist @SallaTuomivaara @NinaVNygren Iso ongelma on keskustelun ja toimenpiteiden pyöriminen väärien asioiden ympärillä. Pitäisi pystyä keskustelmaan vaikuttavista asioista (kuten autottomasta elämäntavasta tai veganismista) ja keskittyä vähemmän esim.
RT @CaVaessenVe: Still not decided yet on how to start reducing your #carbonfootprint? Look at this #research paper who identified 4 key hi…
RT @ZuivelenKlimaat: Welke acties kan je ondernemen om je eigen CO2-voetafdruk te verlagen? Minder vlees eten of? Wist je dat een een keer…
Welke acties kan je ondernemen om je eigen CO2-voetafdruk te verlagen? Minder vlees eten of? Wist je dat een een keer niet naar ver weg vliegen (Thailand bijvoorbeeld) evenveel CO2 kan besparen als twee jaar vegetarisch eten? #SustainabledairyEU https:/
@ScepticalDoctor @GHGGuru I see @GHGGuru quoted the below paper, which describes plant-based diets as "one of four widely applicable high-impact (i.e. low emissions) actions with the potential to contribute to systemic change and substantially reduce annua
RT @GHGGuru: @ScepticalDoctor This scientific article shows, that going vegan for one year will safe 0.8t of CO2e. Contrast that by one tra…
@ScepticalDoctor This scientific article shows, that going vegan for one year will safe 0.8t of CO2e. Contrast that by one transatlantic flight per passenger, which causes 1.6t of CO2e. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8 https://t.co/oppaZjuspg
Still not decided yet on how to start reducing your #carbonfootprint? Look at this #research paper who identified 4 key high-impact solution out of 39 sources of #carbonemission #solutions. https://t.co/AXJv9zJSm5
@CMYKGenet Another interesting tidbit from the same study https://t.co/Q7U3rNgixF https://t.co/VbKY71GIsA
@AllanBoat A 2017 study recommends the following personal actions: 1. having one fewer child 2. living car-free 3. avoiding travel by air 4. eating a plant-based diet The least effective actions were recycling & using low energy light bulbs. https:
@ThePalomina Las mineras son terribles, pero eso no nos exime de nuestra responsabilidad individual. https://t.co/gt70qvuxEy
@HenriBontenbal Beste is geen kinderen te krijgen ... ... ... *dan een hele tijd niets* ... ... ... geen auto te bezitten (of eventueel elektrisch te rijden, liefst op groene energie), niet te vliegen, groene energie te gebruiken, en dan pas komt iets aan
@cfhinor @maxcordiez @AliceDesbiolles Erreur de lien, je voulais pointer l'étude de Seth Wynes et Kimberly A Nicholas : https://t.co/Nvz9B6sJak Aucune de ces propositions ne seront volontairement appliquées par la population (sauf p.ê arrêter l'avion) don
El cambio político para regular la industria y la producción tiene que comenzar YA. Y desde lo individual, no perdamos el foco: lo que más sirve es no comer carne, no tener auto, evitar los vuelos transatlánticos, y de ser posible tener 1 hijo menos 👇🏽
@JeremiahLee This has been studied. Having one fewer child is estimated to reduce CO2 equivalent emissions 30 times as much as living a car free life and was mentioned in 0 of the textbooks the study covered. https://t.co/qvoDcECPHv https://t.co/FVSqzccUc8
@TyotoRiffle @NYGovCuomo And do you know what the single worst action is in regards to enlarging one's carbon footprint? See Figure 1. https://t.co/7ZWUxsWedg Since it is science (social agendas don't matter), an ending of all natalist subsidies coupled
@CecileMichaut @CFroidevauxMett @MartinWinckler Assez étonné aussi, j'ai été regarder : il s'agit des émissions cumulées de toute la vie de l'enfant et de ses descendants, affectées par moitié aux parents et divisées par leur espérance de vie... https://t.
RT @kuroi234: CO2削減に寄与する行動、「産む子供の数を1人少なくする」が年58.6トンで圧倒的1位(2017年の記事) https://t.co/mbC3ijsYos https://t.co/4KBfYbuKZT https://t.co/ao3z20mFs8
@PattyMurray In the very least, Sen. Murray can come out against all existence and consumption subsidies and not only call for the end of all natalist subsidies but demand a per head carbon breeding tax. Science up until it hits one's social agenda. http
RT @marcoapostoli: @SteB777 @GeorgeMonbiot Not having children at all is *by far* the single individual available choice that most reduces…
@SteB777 @GeorgeMonbiot Not having children at all is *by far* the single individual available choice that most reduces the carbon footprint > https://t.co/r2oW7OTk3o + a meta-analysis on 39 governmental/scientific papers and 148 different international
@nicktemple1 @mcneil_tom Of course, there are some academics who would argue you’ve already passed up the greatest opportunity to reduce carbon emissions...! https://t.co/oPmnMvC0DT
Según este interesante artículo, nuestras decisiones individuales pueden tener mayor impacto en la sostenibilidad, que las prácticas normalmente incentivadas por nuestros líderes. Invito a leer y adoptar comportamientos más sostenibles 👇 https://t.co/Kq9E8
@kathasallier @oeko_kalle @luke43517475 @schirmherrin Ist relativ aber siehe hier zb: https://t.co/ZLsUTP3mtf
RT @kuroi234: CO2削減に寄与する行動、「産む子供の数を1人少なくする」が年58.6トンで圧倒的1位(2017年の記事) https://t.co/mbC3ijsYos https://t.co/4KBfYbuKZT https://t.co/ao3z20mFs8
@babadookspinoza It's also complete rubbish bc wealth is way more influential wrt environmental impacts than population numbers. People like to cite this study for the population argument but fail to even read the abstract which clearly states WHAT populat
Czasem wystarczy tylko obrazek + link. Mądrej głowie dość dwie słowie: having one fewer child (an average for developed countries of 58.6 tonnes CO2-equivalent (tCO2e) emission reductions per year) za: https://t.co/e1MfhYY7MW https://t.co/9yfSsUagAS
The most effective individual actions to #reducecarbonemission https://t.co/bhaDhXrmhO https://t.co/RLvfNNHSKA
@gbdonart There are just so many choices that it would be hard to fill them all out in an infographic. Could make for an interesting interactive website though. Check out my past research here for a start https://t.co/Xq7YyEH2ZJ
@jennawadsworth Such a climate disaster too. Completely uncalled for when campaigning in just NC. https://t.co/ErmQTGRFQz
Source: https://t.co/ywNq4pGrH0
RT @EmmPont: D'où vient ce résultat ? D'une étude de 2017 qui cherche à synthétiser l'empreinte carbone des choix de vie https://t.co/wQgaC…
RT @EmmPont: D'où vient ce résultat ? D'une étude de 2017 qui cherche à synthétiser l'empreinte carbone des choix de vie https://t.co/wQgaC…
D'où vient ce résultat ? D'une étude de 2017 qui cherche à synthétiser l'empreinte carbone des choix de vie https://t.co/wQgaCrENnv Qui sur la question des enfants cite une seule et unique source, une étude de 2008 : https://t.co/f0hshAF0qK
It’s from the voluntary human extinction movement not biased at all
@RockySly9 @stillgray @animal_lover365 It's from the hoary website of the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (bottom of the page): https://t.co/54nO1EZh2r This is the research paper from which the data was pulled: https://t.co/hrydShtkw7
@maaljisa @drasibutramina @dannymndz @IreneAdler_lm Es sencillo: 1 persona produce la mitad de lo que dos personas. La contribución más grande que una persona puede hacer para el ambiente es no reproducirse. Pero sí hay un estudio: https://t.co/lxgk9Fr9rw
En Wynes, & Nicholas 2017 https://t.co/csYGAzrbDr Muestran las acciones que puedes hacer para reducir tu impacto son: Tener menos niños es la primera (es lógico, no?), vivir sin coche, no volar y utilizar energía renovable https://t.co/6IbOHrV5N2
@thatsamoray @pauleastwd @SoEnergyUK @SpeakSarahSpeak I don’t think you’re out on a limb Jamie @WynesSeth and @KA_Nicholas assign basically zero carbon reduction to a renewable energy contract in the U.K. https://t.co/ZUw1N9Y1Xv https://t.co/1Dn5SGsqgf
RT @KimVesto: Den obekväma sanningen att skaffa biologiska barn är en av de värsta saker man kan göra klimatmässigt. https://t.co/WccquqfOOF
Den obekväma sanningen att skaffa biologiska barn är en av de värsta saker man kan göra klimatmässigt.
@KimVesto Inte äta kött sparar 0,8 ton CO2/år. Inte köra bil 1,6 ton CO2/år. Inte skaffa fem barn sparar utsläpp av 293,2 ton CO2/år. https://t.co/rrf3oCesCp
@piersforster @diana_nbd @CREDS_UK @PriestleyCentre Not so sure of the timeliness of the @BBC report. The underlying scientific publication in ERL is three year old https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
Si no queréis hablar con ellos también podéis leer el paper que fundamenta el panel https://t.co/AWQnYiVUJi En fin que si queremos hacer #EducaciónAmbiental tenemos que informarnos bien.
@GeorgeMonbiot Overpopulation concern is not racism. Overconsumption concern is not leftism. The poor suffer and die in regions where the environmental effects of overconsumption are most severe. A solution must be found. https://t.co/UqLhLUU0nl
RT @TheDisproof: https://t.co/WtnyxKdZJl "having one fewer child (an average for developed countries of 58.6 tonnes CO2-equivalent (tCO2e)…
https://t.co/WtnyxKdZJl "having one fewer child (an average for developed countries of 58.6 tonnes CO2-equivalent (tCO2e) emission reductions per year)" Why did the study below ignore it: https://t.co/FZuvt1eRS8
RT @nerdphysicist: P.S. The author of the opinion piece already has 2 kids, so they've already done more damage to the environment than the…
P.S. The author of the opinion piece already has 2 kids, so they've already done more damage to the environment than their vegetarianism could ever reverse. https://t.co/KnA7fhF8u0 https://t.co/36DmecRgA4
@diana_nbd @IOPscience Great paper! It's good to see "no pets" included, but how about "no children" (or fewer)? A previous study had shown this to be, by a long way, the most significant action! I'm surprised family size isn't mentioned... (graph from htt
@cragcrest @ScienceNews Here is another take on typical eco footprints - derived from https://t.co/BOrsKryxRG https://t.co/yu1j2yPisR
@GeorgeMonbiot The US has a 40% unintended pregnancy rate. Impact is measured by multiplying consumption per capita by population. Population is half the equation whichever way you want to cut it. https://t.co/WtnyxKdZJl
@ScientistsX @GeorgeMonbiot Impact is measured by multiplying consumption per capita by population. Unintended pregnancy in rich countries (e.g. the US has a 40% unintended pregnancy rate) is probably the largest individual impact an individual can have i
@Russ8111 It’s actually the correct answer according to this study https://t.co/fHfCW2v1c0
@FutureIsTesla @teslainvernon According to this study, having one fewer child is one of the highest-impact actions a person can do to substantially reduce annual personal emissions (saving an average of 58.6 tons of CO2 emissions every year) https://t.co/f