@El_Pinta Presentazione generale di articolo scientifico di esempio https://t.co/r2oW7OTk3o + la relativa meta-analisi (in lettura integrale e aperta, fortunatamente) su 39 diversi paper governativi/scientifici e 148 vari scenari internazionali di sviluppo
@ombrerosse_ Lascia stare il lato più new age, che repelle anche me. Ecco invece la presentazione generale di un articolo https://t.co/l0FtuKZAqH + la relativa meta-analisi (in lettura aperta) su 39 paper governativi/scientifici e 148 scenari internazional
RT @Stfko_memero: @JoeNavea No es un tema que me fascine mucho así que no lo he estudiado, pero ésto me he topado jaja -pq debieras esteri…
RT @Stfko_memero: @JoeNavea No es un tema que me fascine mucho así que no lo he estudiado, pero ésto me he topado jaja -pq debieras esteri…
RT @Stfko_memero: @JoeNavea No es un tema que me fascine mucho así que no lo he estudiado, pero ésto me he topado jaja -pq debieras esteri…
RT @Stfko_memero: Dos de los papers más edgys que he leído jajajaja Ambos sobre temas medio ambientales
Dos de los papers más edgys que he leído jajajaja Ambos sobre temas medio ambientales
@JoeNavea No es un tema que me fascine mucho así que no lo he estudiado, pero ésto me he topado jaja -pq debieras esterilizarte y ser vegetariano [1]https://t.co/zJXuNyO7Cr -pq tus viajes de placer por el mundo hacen cagar al planeta [2]https://t.co/8ixp
RT @Antarcticacl: Una persona Vegetariana🥬 evita emisión de ~800kg/año de CO2-e contribuyendo a mitigar #CambioClimatico👏 Pero desafortunad…
RT @Antarcticacl: Una persona Vegetariana🥬 evita emisión de ~800kg/año de CO2-e contribuyendo a mitigar #CambioClimatico👏 Pero desafortunad…
@vickyhsmith Hi Vicky, please see analysis led by @WynesSeth for annual estimates of personal climate actions like living car-free. https://t.co/fYCrMM8P4R (FAQs and more here: https://t.co/U4I2eecR8s)
@FarmingUK Pure insanity to claim that ‘only’ being ‘a leading’ & not ‘the largest’ cause of the DESTRUCTION OF THE PLANET(!!!) is a victory for AnimalAg. 😳 Also Lund predates Oxford hence older data. Here are both: ‘the’ https://t.co/k24hDfTuco &
Most western countries have below replacement rates of fertility. And yet we see recommendations like "have fewer kids" to fight climate change https://t.co/UjXBq31FcL Literally throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
@altonbrown Not at all. And canceling the flight because you are worried about climate changes is a good move too. https://t.co/ErmQTGRFQz #ClimateEmergency https://t.co/kumyGn3EUV
"The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions" https://t.co/LpnF33TThe • have one child less • live car-free • avoid air travel • eat a plant-based diet The rest (like switching lightbul
The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/lHFinYdUH3 via @IOPscience
@galatea128 @Nopanaden Se ha hecho, sí 😅 https://t.co/a9VikB1tfu
@Standard_Merch @MeganFaust667 @CrimZon_666 @ChurchofSatan Having more than a child is really harmful for the environment and society https://t.co/KPzpAKt5LB
Son datos y hay que darlos https://t.co/KUPrAcKopk https://t.co/liddJMJFAC
RT @dominicroser: 4/ What’s wrong this number? The number is from a study by @KA_Nicholas & @WynesSeth. The study asked a fantastic (and…
4/ What’s wrong this number? The number is from a study by @KA_Nicholas & @WynesSeth. The study asked a fantastic (and neglected) question. But, unfortunately, it answered the question in a bad way. https://t.co/XmKWzmL4kn
@QuayMatt This research supports the Omni's statement. Honest question...why do you feel the statement is stupid? Multiple lifestyle decisions can help the environment. FWIW my wife & I are both vegan, own an electric car, don't fly, & have no kids
RT @Brodo91: @repubblica È più disarmante il fatto che un giornale come il vostro non sappia che hanno ragione. Scelte personali quelle 4.…
@repubblica È più disarmante il fatto che un giornale come il vostro non sappia che hanno ragione. Scelte personali quelle 4. Ma vere e scientificamente confermate. https://t.co/sOOauK9m0f
@gordon_struth @pirntatonjim @PaulBMcGill @bwmilker @GeorgeMonbiot @guardian Not sure how to reconcile your claims with studies such as this one, though I could have missed something crucial. https://t.co/7xPLRmbsl3
RT @adamcorlett: Someone asked me yesterday: is having children (in the UK) bad for the planet? In 2017, having one fewer child was report…
@gtrdblt @Nain_Portekoi C’est probablement rien par rapport à l’objet acheté en lui-même. Vaut mieux moins consommer. Et le vrai combat c’est de ne pas prendre la voiture pour les trajets quotidien. Ça ça a un vrai impact sur les émissions de CO2. https://
Having two children is probably the best thing you can do for yourself, your partner, and for your future geriatric selves.
@PhillisKathy @kordezm @ALeighMP @MichaelEMann Hahaha mate, that's ignorance. Sit down and read this study: https://t.co/vhnDNbGJaC Then we can talk.
@howemill @RawCowsMilk @OldHallFm @SoilAssociation @EdDickson7 @farmer_richiet @MossgielFarm @GreenCityCoop @forestfarmdairy @CalfAtFootDairy @smilingtreefarm @ChathamsDairy @JoannaBlythman "4 recommended actions that are of substantial magnitude throughou
RT @adamcorlett: Someone asked me yesterday: is having children (in the UK) bad for the planet? In 2017, having one fewer child was report…
RT @adamcorlett: Someone asked me yesterday: is having children (in the UK) bad for the planet? In 2017, having one fewer child was report…
RT @adamcorlett: Someone asked me yesterday: is having children (in the UK) bad for the planet? In 2017, having one fewer child was report…
Adam's pro-babies, because he's optimistic on decarbonisation. If you're less optimistic then stop procreating
Someone asked me yesterday: is having children (in the UK) bad for the planet? In 2017, having one fewer child was reported as being the best thing you could do for the climate; ahead of avoiding driving, flying and non-plant-based food. https://t.co/3eMJ
@Ellen_Ojala Entäs jos tiedeyhteisö toteaa sen nimenomaan tehokkaimmaksi tavaksi? Eikös ilmastoaktivismilta mene uskottavuus jos se valitsee hyväksyttävät vaikutustavat subjektiivisesti? https://t.co/CfRxhAGGVu
RT @thatflohstate: @johnshankman @toomuchnick It's based on this paper that discusses the impact of individual actions on a person's carbon…
@johnshankman @toomuchnick It's based on this paper that discusses the impact of individual actions on a person's carbon footprint. https://t.co/MAUNSx6CaN
The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/GwgpxcbkWN via @IOPscience
@WynesSeth @KA_Nicholas My feeling is that, like this paper with climate impacts, some of the more frequently talked about choices like bamboo toothbrushes, while good, might be pretty low impact, and the high impact ones might be surprising or taboo. http
@Conor_McCrave Here the peer reviewed scientific articles with the details: https://t.co/6MB2xokmcI. https://t.co/dvzfh4zfSJ
RT @GHGGuru: @irish2witter @catherinemilk @IFAmedia Check this out. We discussed personal action and GHG. https://t.co/6MB2xokmcI
RT @GHGGuru: @ClimateCiaran @AgriAware Nope. Statement was just to put actions into relation. The following paper shows effects of personal…
@gavinjdaly @gpse7en @potooleifj @GeorgeMonbiot @Channel4 @gcmovie Personal action and climate impacts: https://t.co/6MB2xokmcI
@irish2witter @catherinemilk @IFAmedia Check this out. We discussed personal action and GHG. https://t.co/6MB2xokmcI
@ClimateCiaran @AgriAware Nope. Statement was just to put actions into relation. The following paper shows effects of personal actions on climate. https://t.co/6MB2xokmcI
Look out, Hardin and Malthus; maybe it's not absolute numbers of people the #overpopulation debate should focus on, but where those people are born. According to Wynes, having 1 fewer kid in the US can save 120 tons of #CO2 equivalent per year! #SocEcoSys
@dansiela_b Ich möchte vorschlagen, zu dieser Liste "weniger Fleisch essen" hinzuzufügen. Wenn das Ziel die größtmögliche Reduktion von CO2 ist, ist das eine der effektivsten Maßnahmen. Wissenschaftliche Quelle mit weiteren interessanten Empfehlungen: htt
@CharliePyeSmith @Jamie_Blackett @JayneBuxton2 @theJeremyVine @MadeleineOlivia Herr the newspapers article: https://t.co/akq4zwKkA1 and the underlying scientific paper: https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
@JariLeino3 @SannaHellstrom @AriJLaaksonen Mitä jos kehitysapu suunnataan koulutukseen ja sitä kautta vähennetään niitä globaaleja päästöjä? https://t.co/UUDFIJaC8a
@dodoweiss @JKSteinberger For extra reading https://t.co/kNa0kcJiBE
Those with higher emission and consumption levels, leveraging the most effective actions for reducing #energy consumption in regions with carbon-based energy grids, will have the largest impact. https://t.co/yE7cB4lr4I
@JacobGudiol Hittade den studie jag läst om tidigare nu: https://t.co/lhiixXRPY1
"We have identified four recommended actions which we believe to be especially effective in reducing an individual's greenhouse gas emissions: having one fewer child, living car-free, avoiding airplane travel, and eating a plant-based diet" https://t.co/nh
@andyswarbs @herbivore_club @hamaclean @Channel4News First paragraph, the abstract. https://t.co/6xjaXQy0hO shows the 08 for vegan and 59 for child free. So by my basic math, each child saves = 59 vegans.
@herbivore_club @hamaclean @Channel4News This chart taken from this study shows that the number one thing an individual can do to offset CO2 emissions is not have children. I never said it was justification to wreck the planet. That was just you demonstr
@Ceriond1 Il suffit de cliquer sur le lien fourni. Si vous êtes habitué au compte comme vous dites, vous devriez savoir qu'il y a toujours un lien. Sinon en voici d'autres : 🔗https://t.co/DMt7varHLT 🔗https://t.co/Or738sWisw Je suis déçu aussi par ce genre
> länk till studien. Forskarna undersökte skillnaden mellan olika typer av individuella insatser för klimatet och vad som föreslogs i kanadensiska läroböcker. Fokus låg på insatser med låg effekt. Ingen tog upp begränsat barnafödande. https://t.co/5rHel
@xseifertx https://t.co/SnviQs6oth Bueno aquí están los datos.
@teletessie @AidanRGallagher the study you provided only compares it to other sorts of diets but here's one that talks about its overall impact (the actual stat was 0.4%, not even 4%) https://t.co/9I2gu6sT4n
RT @GHGGuru: @NickCotter100 @Lauratobin1 Here is the scientific paper behind the figure @NickCotter100 shared. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
RT @GHGGuru: @NickCotter100 @Lauratobin1 Here is the scientific paper behind the figure @NickCotter100 shared. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
RT @GHGGuru: @NickCotter100 @Lauratobin1 Here is the scientific paper behind the figure @NickCotter100 shared. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
RT @GHGGuru: @NickCotter100 @Lauratobin1 Here is the scientific paper behind the figure @NickCotter100 shared. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
RT @GHGGuru: @NickCotter100 @Lauratobin1 Here is the scientific paper behind the figure @NickCotter100 shared. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
RT @GHGGuru: @NickCotter100 @Lauratobin1 Here is the scientific paper behind the figure @NickCotter100 shared. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
RT @GHGGuru: @NickCotter100 @Lauratobin1 Here is the scientific paper behind the figure @NickCotter100 shared. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
RT @GHGGuru: @NickCotter100 @Lauratobin1 Here is the scientific paper behind the figure @NickCotter100 shared. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
RT @GHGGuru: @NickCotter100 @Lauratobin1 Here is the scientific paper behind the figure @NickCotter100 shared. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
@NickCotter100 @Lauratobin1 Here is the scientific paper behind the figure @NickCotter100 shared. https://t.co/6MB2xo2KO8
RT @NOTDumPhuk: #FoodWorldOrder (Dogs and cats are responsible for a quarter of the greenhouse gas emissions with up to 64 million tons of…
@RuthHeindel @thermokarst @sarahecrump @IceSheetMike @Mettebendixen08 Could it possibly be https://t.co/orGpGywmVT? There was quite a bit of press around it at the time.
@RuthHeindel @thermokarst @sarahecrump @IceSheetMike @Mettebendixen08 This one? https://t.co/yJvyFVGXk2 Wynes, S. & Nicholas, K. A. The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environ
@NestorGarciaMtz 1) Tener menos hijos 2) Usar menos el auto 3) Usar menos aviones 4) Comer menos carne Todo lo demás apenas y pinta. https://t.co/iNKLsDLw2r
RT @MarkusVinnari: Tuntuu, että nyt olisi taas hyvä hetki pohtia yksilön mahdollisuuksia vaikuttaa ilmastonmuutoksen hillintään. Vaikuttav…
RT @MarkusVinnari: Tuntuu, että nyt olisi taas hyvä hetki pohtia yksilön mahdollisuuksia vaikuttaa ilmastonmuutoksen hillintään. Vaikuttav…
RT @MarkusVinnari: Tuntuu, että nyt olisi taas hyvä hetki pohtia yksilön mahdollisuuksia vaikuttaa ilmastonmuutoksen hillintään. Vaikuttav…
RT @MarkusVinnari: Tuntuu, että nyt olisi taas hyvä hetki pohtia yksilön mahdollisuuksia vaikuttaa ilmastonmuutoksen hillintään. Vaikuttav…
RT @MarkusVinnari: Tuntuu, että nyt olisi taas hyvä hetki pohtia yksilön mahdollisuuksia vaikuttaa ilmastonmuutoksen hillintään. Vaikuttav…
RT @MarkusVinnari: Tuntuu, että nyt olisi taas hyvä hetki pohtia yksilön mahdollisuuksia vaikuttaa ilmastonmuutoksen hillintään. Vaikuttav…
RT @MarkusVinnari: Tuntuu, että nyt olisi taas hyvä hetki pohtia yksilön mahdollisuuksia vaikuttaa ilmastonmuutoksen hillintään. Vaikuttav…
RT @eleonpalmero: ¿Pueden nuestras acciones cotidianas reducir las emisiones de GEI? 🤔🌎 ⏩The climate mitigation gap: education and governm…
Lisäisin näin joulun alla: Kuluta ja osta vähemmän! Tee harkittuja ostopäätöksiä ja suosi kotimaista.
Tuntuu, että nyt olisi taas hyvä hetki pohtia yksilön mahdollisuuksia vaikuttaa ilmastonmuutoksen hillintään. Vaikuttavimmat teot: 1. Minimoi lapsiluku 2. Vältä yksityisautoilua 3. Vältä lentomatkustamista 4. Noudata kasvispainotteista ruokavaliota https
FYI, average per-capita emissions of greenhouse gases United States (16.4 tCO2/year) per capita in 2016. *Need to cut 1.2 tCO2 every year (Cut 8% per year until it's 0 emissions). Australia (16.3 tCO2) Canada (13.5 tCO2), European Union (6.7 tCO2)
We like Thunberg's results focus: Worse case triggered at 340 Gigatons emitted; 42 Gigatons/year is current rate. Gone in 7 years, the ability to stay within 1.5C target. have 1 less child=58 tonnes CO2 live car-free=2.8 no planes=1.6 eat plants=0.8 http
S. auch https://t.co/daSv2MLMzd, ich hoffe, dass die Kinderzahl in Zukunft weniger Einfluss hat! https://t.co/4FFBstBfg0
¿Pueden nuestras acciones cotidianas reducir las emisiones de GEI? 🤔🌎 ⏩The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/oq5sbaMDb1 Bajo impacto (amarillo) Medio impacto (azul) Al
@_esveco @provegES @BuenoyVegano @otracuentavegan @EsXrebellion @PorComedor @madrid_vegano @canalsur @IgualdadAnimal @biocultura @JuventudXClima @FridayForMadrid @f4f_barcelona Como casi siempre en estás listas falta la acción individual con es más grande
RT @palebluedotguy: US emissions/person (16.4 tons/yr) are ~8x higher than needed by 2050 to avoid +2C warming. What can you do? 1) Have o…
US emissions/person (16.4 tons/yr) are ~8x higher than needed by 2050 to avoid +2C warming. What can you do? 1) Have one fewer child [-120 tons/yr]* 2) Live car free [-3 tons/yr] 3) Buy green energy [-1.5 tons/yr] 4) Eat a plant-based diet [-0.8 tons/yr]
RT @H_Enea: The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/sR…
The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/sRaZK5BOW5 vía @IOPscience
The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions https://t.co/ZgJOQWgsBd vía @IOPscience
Impacto de acciones individuales en la reducción de emisiones (en toneladas equivalentes de CO2): - No tener un hijo 60/año - No tener un coche 2,2/año - Prescindir de un vuelo 1,5 - No comer carne 0,8/año - Reciclar 0,2/año https://t.co/ng0Nirb000 https
‘The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions’ an article on #ScienceOpen: https://t.co/zxi0RNgoh5