Malcolm is a dangerous idiot. Don't be like Malcolm. https://t.co/1aF0f6EAC4 https://t.co/vcp8s4fIZT
"When people lack the expertise & skill to evaluate science behind a claim, they typically rely on heuristics such as substituting judgment about something complex (i.e. science) with something simple (i.e. character of people who speak about science)"
@agentsinaction @musikutiv @CScharun Hat wahrscheinlich meinen Tweet & die Studie zu #PLURV (bzw. #FLICC im Englischen) „übersehen“! Cook, J., Ellerton, P., and Kinkead, D. (2018). Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors. Env
@musikutiv @CScharun Da gibt‘s übrigens auch eine veröffentlichte Studie dazu: Cook, J., Ellerton, P., and Kinkead, D. (2018). Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors. Environmental Research Letters, 11(2). https://t.co/u2xGAwZfC
@Veritatem2021 Still waiting, btw. Dog ate your deduction? https://t.co/GsITu3vJel
@Veritatem2021 So, what's your evidence that AGW doesn't exist, and how did you deduce it? https://t.co/8ymhUQ9yTv https://t.co/GGdnL6EbwA
RT @catandman: @DickDelingpole @thecoastguy FYI the 97% figure of believers is another lie. Cook's paper is easy to see as bunk when broken…
RT @catandman: Cook et al's paper is easy to see as bunk when broken down into his wholly inappropriate classification and manipulation (pi…
RT @catandman: @DickDelingpole @thecoastguy FYI the 97% figure of believers is another lie. Cook's paper is easy to see as bunk when broken…
RT @catandman: @DickDelingpole @thecoastguy FYI the 97% figure of believers is another lie. Cook's paper is easy to see as bunk when broken…
RT @catandman: @DickDelingpole @thecoastguy FYI the 97% figure of believers is another lie. Cook's paper is easy to see as bunk when broken…
RT @catandman: @DickDelingpole @thecoastguy FYI the 97% figure of believers is another lie. Cook's paper is easy to see as bunk when broken…
RT @catandman: @DickDelingpole @thecoastguy FYI the 97% figure of believers is another lie. Cook's paper is easy to see as bunk when broken…
RT @catandman: @DickDelingpole @thecoastguy FYI the 97% figure of believers is another lie. Cook's paper is easy to see as bunk when broken…
RT @catandman: @DickDelingpole @thecoastguy FYI the 97% figure of believers is another lie. Cook's paper is easy to see as bunk when broken…
RT @catandman: @DickDelingpole @thecoastguy FYI the 97% figure of believers is another lie. Cook's paper is easy to see as bunk when broken…
@DickDelingpole @thecoastguy FYI the 97% figure of believers is another lie. Cook's paper is easy to see as bunk when broken down into his wholly inappropriate classification and data manipulation (pic). More blatant than a climate model. https://t.co/XX3D
RT @catandman: Cook et al's paper is easy to see as bunk when broken down into his wholly inappropriate classification and manipulation (pi…
RT @catandman: Cook et al's paper is easy to see as bunk when broken down into his wholly inappropriate classification and manipulation (pi…
Cook et al's paper is easy to see as bunk when broken down into his wholly inappropriate classification and manipulation (pic). More falsely presumptive than a climate model. There are >1400 deterministic scientists in CLINTEL for a start. Cook paper he
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
@Protectbypaint And another here. The irony.... https://t.co/Tmj1jWGk5i
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
Parfait ! Un visuel à garder sous le coude. Les #Climatosceptiques bougent encore.
🧵#ClimateEmergency #ClimateCrisis
RT @skepticscience: #15 We create resources like animated GIFs of myth deconstructions to help with the debunking of climate-related misinf…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
@klimainitiative Für diese Behauptung haben wir auf @skepticscience übrigens seit Kurzem eine logikbasierte Widerlegung als animiertes GIF und Schritt für Schritt Erklärung https://t.co/ld9Hd5quEr Inspiriert von der Studie https://t.co/ssmdHlAtOw https://t
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @BaerbelW: Die Studie "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/ssmdHlAtOw) von @johnfocook, @d…
💚👍Sehr schön gemacht.
🧵von @skepticscience zur englischen Version https://t.co/Z73aA1so38
Die Studie "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/ssmdHlAtOw) von @johnfocook, @davekinkead & @Reasondisabled inspirierte die Erstellung logikbasierter Widerlegungen einiger Klimamythen als animierte GIFs. h
RT @skepticscience: #15 We create resources like animated GIFs of myth deconstructions to help with the debunking of climate-related misinf…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
Myths.
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @AlainLetour: Liste impressionnante de sophismes utilisés dans le déni du changement climatique.
RT @AlainLetour: Liste impressionnante de sophismes utilisés dans le déni du changement climatique.
Liste impressionnante de sophismes utilisés dans le déni du changement climatique.
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
#15 We create resources like animated GIFs of myth deconstructions to help with the debunking of climate-related misinformation: https://t.co/ROVqhgjJnD
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @DavidSalesaD: Hilo con explicaciones de porqué las falacias climáticas no son argumentos válidos con 9 ejemplos típicos 👇
Hilo con explicaciones de porqué las falacias climáticas no son argumentos válidos con 9 ejemplos típicos 👇
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @NienkeHaan: Hoewel misleidende claims in de categorieën 'klimaatwetenschap & -beweging zijn onbetrouwbaar' of 'voorgestelde oplossingen…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @NienkeHaan: Hoewel misleidende claims in de categorieën 'klimaatwetenschap & -beweging zijn onbetrouwbaar' of 'voorgestelde oplossingen…
Hoewel misleidende claims in de categorieën 'klimaatwetenschap & -beweging zijn onbetrouwbaar' of 'voorgestelde oplossingen werken niet' vaker voorkomen, komen claims in de cat. klimaatverandering is niet echt, niet erg of niet onze schuld ook nog rege
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
Myth deconstruction til næste gang du render ind i argumenter som 👇🏼
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
I love this resource! I've been deconstructing myths in my class for a few years using the framework published by @johnfocook and colleagues for some time. These graphics will help this process a lot! Thanks!
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…
The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook, @davekinkead & @Reasondisabled inspired the creation of a new graphics resource category for myth deconstructions as animated GIFs
@Joffrey77855104 Die gängigen Desinformationsstrategien von Klimawandelleugnern sind inzwischen ein wissenschaftlich gut beschriebenes Phänomen, z.B.: https://t.co/wanhmdTZ61
RT @LuluLemew: 🔥#Inoculationtheory offers one approach to effectively neutralize the influence of #misinformation Research: https://t.co/A…
We made the video as a video abstract for our critical thinking research published in @IOPenvironment - we developed a step-by-step methodology for deconstructing & analysing misinformation in order to identify reasoning fallacies https://t.co/mKSdVgeK
@mcnisbet @cboussalis @MaxMossler @AEI @RogerPielkeJr It requires bringing in other disciplines like critical thinking philosophy - work I've done with @Reasondisabled & @davekinkead to use critical thinking to deconstruct & identify reasoning fall
RT @johnfocook: @GreenJimll @SciReports @TravisCoan1 @cboussalis We explain in the paper that what we’ve done is document what contrarian s…
@RogerPielkeJr "..we propose inoculating against misinformation by explaining the fallacious reasoning within misleading denialist claims. " https://t.co/th8U9kr0eu
RT @gri_mm: Gegen Fake News helfen keine Fakten, so die "inoculation theory", sondern detailliertes Auseinander-Nehmen der logischen Fehler…
RT @gri_mm: Gegen Fake News helfen keine Fakten, so die "inoculation theory", sondern detailliertes Auseinander-Nehmen der logischen Fehler…
RT @gri_mm: Gegen Fake News helfen keine Fakten, so die "inoculation theory", sondern detailliertes Auseinander-Nehmen der logischen Fehler…
RT @gri_mm: Gegen Fake News helfen keine Fakten, so die "inoculation theory", sondern detailliertes Auseinander-Nehmen der logischen Fehler…
RT @gri_mm: Gegen Fake News helfen keine Fakten, so die "inoculation theory", sondern detailliertes Auseinander-Nehmen der logischen Fehler…
RT @gri_mm: Gegen Fake News helfen keine Fakten, so die "inoculation theory", sondern detailliertes Auseinander-Nehmen der logischen Fehler…
Gegen Fake News helfen keine Fakten, so die "inoculation theory", sondern detailliertes Auseinander-Nehmen der logischen Fehler in den Argumenten. https://t.co/ewXhUwIzBr
@juhariis We're already working on combining our machine learning research with our critical thinking research (https://t.co/mKSdVgeKSH). I haven't even started to think about how we might combine that with my @crankyuncles research using humor & games
@GreenJimll @SciReports @TravisCoan1 @cboussalis We explain in the paper that what we’ve done is document what contrarian sources claim, not whether their claims are valid. Assessing whether their claims are valid is a different task which @Reasondisabled,
"Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" https://t.co/nMOIdLZ1Yo
@TomChivers @TamarHaspel @cp_elevated @unherd Categories are just a way of organising or making sense of misinformation. You can cut to the heart of misinforming arguments via critical thinking methods, as @Reasondisabled, @davekinkead & I do in identi
Oh dear- move on buffoon https://t.co/OMl3Fmg3Mt
#auspol This paper by Cook has nothing to do with climate but the nature of the argument. To place it in the title is ethically wrong although its possible to argue also about ethics >https://t.co/Cp8ngwbVOa
#auspol This paper by Cook has environment and climate in the title but has absolutely nothing to do with environment but about the logical deduction process in psychology. Why would he put it there? >https://t.co/qmdtnsr5wC
RT @Veritatem2021: John Cook published the 2013 junk "science" 97% consensus paper and created the Skeptical Science website which has desc…
RT @Veritatem2021: John Cook published the 2013 junk "science" 97% consensus paper and created the Skeptical Science website which has desc…
RT @Veritatem2021: John Cook published the 2013 junk "science" 97% consensus paper and created the Skeptical Science website which has desc…
RT @Veritatem2021: John Cook published the 2013 junk "science" 97% consensus paper and created the Skeptical Science website which has desc…