RT @johnfocook: @KenCaldeira @MarkCNorwich @carnegiescience There's plenty of research showing that clear science communication can be canc…
RT @johnfocook: @KenCaldeira @MarkCNorwich @carnegiescience There's plenty of research showing that clear science communication can be canc…
RT @johnfocook: @KenCaldeira @MarkCNorwich @carnegiescience There's plenty of research showing that clear science communication can be canc…
@KenCaldeira @MarkCNorwich @carnegiescience There's plenty of research showing that clear science communication can be cancelled out by misinformation, which is why science messages need to be accompanied with explanations of how that science might get dis
Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors #climateaction #climatechange #climatecrisis #ClimateEmergency https://t.co/WgyR68FQXA via @IOPscience
We do this in our MOOC at http://denial101x & in our study using critical thinking to deconstruct misinformation https://t.co/mKSdVgeKSH
@Reasondisabled @davekinkead @UQxCourses The journal @IOPenvironment were keen on "video abstracts" introducing new scientific papers so we decided to have a bit of fun with it. Our published paper where we use critical thinking to deconstruct climate misi
https://t.co/GJJpCzFATc and the link to an article which might be of interest to @MGHToll , @horrdorr , and @simonahac
RT @johnfocook: @444Cin444 If you're genuinely interested in the answer, I recommend reading https://t.co/mKSdVgeKSH where @davekinkead, @…
@444Cin444 If you're genuinely interested in the answer, I recommend reading https://t.co/mKSdVgeKSH where @davekinkead, @reasondisabled, & I deconstruct climate misinformation, identifying reasoning fallacies. This research is the critical thinking f
RT @johnfocook: @sumnerd Thx Dawn! Do you mean our @denial101x MOOC? The #CrankyUncle game & @denial101x are built on the same foundation:…
@sumnerd Thx Dawn! Do you mean our @denial101x MOOC? The #CrankyUncle game & @denial101x are built on the same foundation: my inoculation research https://t.co/D0UQMXRQzn & critical thinking work https://t.co/mKSdVgeKSH
@MichaelEMann @skepticscience I like the following line of reasoning, though ist may work only for people capable of logical thinking: https://t.co/VtQH778avD
Wissenschaftliches Paper welches beschreibt, wie Ihr mit ein wenig Logikkenntnissen die Scheinargumente von Klimawandel-Leugnern bloßstellt. Danke @MInkorrekt https://t.co/35R7XCdjh7
#mi #methodischinkorrekt Thema https://t.co/oABM881uPv "Strategien gg #Klimaleugner ", wobei diese als Beispiel fungieren. Allgemein geht es eher um #Logik Fehler in vielen "Argumentationsketten" #Klima #Klimawandel #climatecrisis
@MarkHoofnagle @tnicholsmd @VPrasadMDMPH Note my inoculation paper was just the first step in my research into how to counter science denial. Next was using critical thinking to deconstruct denial arguments https://t.co/mKSdVgwmhh
RT @BaerbelW: @oekoligenzia @TerliWetter @FridayForFuture Hier ist der Link dazu zur Studie „Deconstructing climate misinformation to ident…
@oekoligenzia @TerliWetter @FridayForFuture Hier ist der Link dazu zur Studie „Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors“ von John Cook, Peter Ellerton and David Kinkead https://t.co/5ZurBeW0qF und der Link zum (lustigen) Video-Ab
@Hezerminator @MariPantsar Asiaan liittyen: tämä Cookin, Ellertonin & Kinkeadin Environmental Research Letters –tiedesarjassa julkaistu artikkeli on suositeltavaa luettavaa kaikille, jotka haluavat ymmärtää ilmastodenialistien argumentointia ja niiden
RT @JoshGellers: @ESG_Project @UUCopernicus @janpaulvansoest I just spent the past week in my Controversial Political Issues course discuss…
@ESG_Project @UUCopernicus @janpaulvansoest I just spent the past week in my Controversial Political Issues course discussing the factors that lead to climate denialism. Here are a couple great articles on the subject: https://t.co/aZXewdt5AO https://t.co/
@MiketheScribe @UCBerkeley My research thread over the last few years: How do we counter misinformation? Inoculation https://t.co/D0UQMXRQzn How do we construct inoculating messages? Critical thinking https://t.co/mKSdVgeKSH How do we format inoculations?
@andrew_harmer @TIMSHEL51 yes, this article was a nice summary of our critical thinking paper re climate change at https://t.co/mKSdVgwmhh
When it comes to #ClimateChange, there is a lot of misunderstanding present in discourse. How can these fallacious claims be challenged best to promote better understanding? This humerous #VideoAbstract https://t.co/ebL5XNQdaR introduces the paper http
RT @MaibachEd: Chapman G and Python M 1989 The Complete Monty Python’s Flying Circus: All the Words (London: Pantheon). BAM! @Mason4C @ske…
Chapman G and Python M 1989 The Complete Monty Python’s Flying Circus: All the Words (London: Pantheon). BAM! @Mason4C @skepticscience @NaomiOreskes @SarahFRobinson @boykoff
RT @SarahFRobinson: Delightful video abstract sets a new bar for peer-reviewed research papers! #ClimateChange craves a light touch—@johnfo…
RT @SarahFRobinson: Delightful video abstract sets a new bar for peer-reviewed research papers! #ClimateChange craves a light touch—@johnfo…
Delightful video abstract sets a new bar for peer-reviewed research papers! #ClimateChange craves a light touch—@johnfocook et al are spot on. More #climate humor: https://t.co/ozUCZVL1Mx @boykoff @ISE_BU @COMatBU @NaomiOreskes @Mason4C @iamjohnoliver #cov
Good stuff! to date I’ve written two papers with all headings that are linton kwesi Johnson lyrics/song titles and public enemy lyrics/song titles. There are some spike lee film titles lurking in my new book too.
@NaomiOreskes Well, let's explore this further - if anyone can find the Monty Python reference in https://t.co/mKSdVgwmhh, tweet the reference in reply! (and be sure to watch our video abstract, I'm very proud of it)
Or no one actually read the paper?or just read the abstract? Or don't know what Easter eggs are? many possible explanations.
@MCKrempel The framework I'm working from is the "five techniques of science denial" (FLICC) where fake experts is one of the techniques used to cast doubt on a scientific consensus. More in our critical thinking paper at https://t.co/mKSdVgwmhh
@TarcyK @aley_aa @thx22099 @WillyCromerroad @LordLindley @TheEnglishRebel @FollowerHpc @Kelly28769778 @thespacepirate @Mitchel06512105 I'll just leave this here: https://t.co/3sL3abHZci
@llewelly sounds like you found the Monty Python Easter egg in https://t.co/mKSdVgwmhh
In our critical thinking paper published in ERL (https://t.co/mKSdVgwmhh), we hid a Monty Python Easter egg but no one noticed - too subtle!
“Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors“ This article reminds of the great work by @KHayhoe on inoculating against #climatechange misinformation https://t.co/yVGp6qruwC
RT @dr_xeo: ¿Cómo deconstruyendo la desinformación del #cambioclimático? El argumento "El clima ha cambiado en el pasado." https://t.co/Pm9…
RT @dr_xeo: @BeaHervella @javisalas A mi me encanta este reciente estudio sobre cómo deconstruir la desinformación del #cambioclimático!!…
RT @dr_xeo: @BeaHervella @javisalas A mi me encanta este reciente estudio sobre cómo deconstruir la desinformación del #cambioclimático!!…
RT @dr_xeo: @BeaHervella @javisalas A mi me encanta este reciente estudio sobre cómo deconstruir la desinformación del #cambioclimático!!…
@BeaHervella @javisalas A mi me encanta este reciente estudio sobre cómo deconstruir la desinformación del #cambioclimático!! https://t.co/MJBKFYhAu9
@micefearboggis @climpeter Video abstracts can be good though. https://t.co/pvI4qJird2 https://t.co/8oHPG2TqOb
Going through this paper on reasoning for climate change and inoculation theory: https://t.co/eWMvFKMEP2 (it's giving me flashbacks to logic in AI and Prolog)
@lenaputtfarcken @skepticscience @denial101x Dann ist ja gut! Fragen zu unseren Aktivitäten beantworte ich gerne auch direkt. Vielleicht ist auch die Critical Thinking Studie von John Cook und Kollegen von Interesse? https://t.co/5ZurBeW0qF
This flowchart reveals more than a dozen fallacies in over 40 climate change denialist claims! https://t.co/3sS1fKvjpH More from Peter Ellerton on @RadioNational's Philosophers' Zone (https://t.co/yGp9X8D4gX) and from Ellerton et al.'s paper (https://t.co
Merci. Je doute cependant que les raisonnements spécieux soit le principal frein aux politiques d'envergure en matière de climat
@dieulepsy @Le_Reveilleur @lepharmachien Pas comme si avait été relayé lors de sa sortie cet article et sa très sympathique vidéo en abstract. https://t.co/m3XZpbZ2DH
@Pohtija1 @A_Ahokas @Haavisto Cookin, Ellertonin & Kinkeadin artikkeli Environmental Research Letters –sarjassa on ehdottoman suositeltavaa luettavaa kaikille, jotka haluavat ymmärtää ja purkaa ilmastodenialistien argumentointia. 5/5 https://t.co/Rad
#scicomm Video abstract as part of a published paper. Open access.
RT @Mel_Salazar_PD: I was looking for inspiration to improve my #scicomm skills and found this video abstract published a year ago... (Pls…
I was looking for inspiration to improve my #scicomm skills and found this video abstract published a year ago... (Pls watch, recommended for all audiences) #scicomm #LifeGoals https://t.co/YJuRvwunWT via @IOPscience
@joonahermanni @PerusVirtanen Cookin, Ellertonin & Kinkeadin artikkeli Environmental Research Letters –sarjassa on ehdottoman suositeltavaa luettavaa kaikille, jotka haluavat ymmärtää ja purkaa ilmastodenialistien argumentointia. https://t.co/RadowHC
Sehr schön: Video-Abstract zu paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/qqBCmRhY19) https://t.co/nWHxCYhvb9 via @YouTube
@RSchusterJR @Thatsaying @LCholmondley @STWorg Along with @davekinkead & @Reasondisabled, I deconstruct the “climate’s changed in the past” in great detail in https://t.co/tQQvJTjlHI
Päättelyä tuntuu olevan jos jonkinmoista ja johtopäätöksiä vedellään ns hihasta?
RT @pekkarahko: @PanuHalme Cookin, Ellertonin & Kinkeadin artikkeli Environmental Research Letters –sarjassa on ehdottoman suositeltavaa lu…
RT @pekkarahko: @PanuHalme Cookin, Ellertonin & Kinkeadin artikkeli Environmental Research Letters –sarjassa on ehdottoman suositeltavaa lu…
@PanuHalme Cookin, Ellertonin & Kinkeadin artikkeli Environmental Research Letters –sarjassa on ehdottoman suositeltavaa luettavaa kaikille, jotka haluavat ymmärtää ja purkaa ilmastodenialistien harhaista argumentointia. 4/4 https://t.co/RadowHC3dH
RT @johnfocook: Applying critical thinking to the #climate myth "cold weather disproves global warming". This argument is logically invalid…
RT @johnfocook: Applying critical thinking to the #climate myth "cold weather disproves global warming". This argument is logically invalid…
RT @johnfocook: Applying critical thinking to the #climate myth "cold weather disproves global warming". This argument is logically invalid…
@SAndrewDKos We need different messages for different audiences. I agree that inoculating parallel arguments in cartoon form are user-friendlier & get shared more on social media. Nevertheless, some people are keen to develop their critical thinking sk
RT @skepticscience: For a fun explanation check out the video abstract accompanying the paper! https://t.co/f8XRHIpyBx - https://t.co/JYEBN…
RT @johnfocook: Applying critical thinking to the #climate myth "cold weather disproves global warming". This argument is logically invalid…
RT @johnfocook: Applying critical thinking to the #climate myth "cold weather disproves global warming". This argument is logically invalid…
RT @johnfocook: Applying critical thinking to the #climate myth "cold weather disproves global warming". This argument is logically invalid…
Desmistificando a onda de frio no hemisfério Norte. Premissa dos Negacionistas."1: em algum lugar no Globo faz frio. 2: se o Aquecimento global existe, então nenhum lugar pode estar frio." Resumo: a natureza não está nem aí pro que pensamos dela.
RT @johnfocook: Applying critical thinking to the #climate myth "cold weather disproves global warming". This argument is logically invalid…
RT @johnfocook: Applying critical thinking to the #climate myth "cold weather disproves global warming". This argument is logically invalid…
Why we need to teach everybody #CriticalThinking? Well, basically to make sure we survive! #ClimateChangeIsReal #climatechange
RT @skepticscience: For a fun explanation check out the video abstract accompanying the paper! https://t.co/f8XRHIpyBx - https://t.co/JYEBN…
RT @johnfocook: We can make the "cold weather disproves global warming" myth logically valid by adding the hidden assumption "no place expe…
RT @johnfocook: Applying critical thinking to the #climate myth "cold weather disproves global warming". This argument is logically invalid…
For a fun explanation check out the video abstract accompanying the paper! https://t.co/f8XRHIpyBx - https://t.co/JYEBN8BiWp
Nice try, but too cerebral; the effective response is to mention how hot it is in Australia, accept the implied win, followed by several exclamation points & the term "pwned"
RT @johnfocook: Applying critical thinking to the #climate myth "cold weather disproves global warming". This argument is logically invalid…
RT @johnfocook: Applying critical thinking to the #climate myth "cold weather disproves global warming". This argument is logically invalid…
We can make the "cold weather disproves global warming" myth logically valid by adding the hidden assumption "no place experiences cold during global warming". But this premise commits the fallacy of impossible expectations. More at https://t.co/tQQvJTjlHI
Applying critical thinking to the #climate myth "cold weather disproves global warming". This argument is logically invalid, commits fallacy of "jumping to conclusions". #GlobalWarming doesn't mean cold events will stop entirely https://t.co/EzIp5DCm3o 1/
RT @pwillemskul: “When people lack expertise to evaluate the science behind something complex (i.e. climate science), they often rely on he…
RT @pwillemskul: “When people lack expertise to evaluate the science behind something complex (i.e. climate science), they often rely on he…
RT @pwillemskul: “When people lack expertise to evaluate the science behind something complex (i.e. climate science), they often rely on he…
RT @pwillemskul: “When people lack expertise to evaluate the science behind something complex (i.e. climate science), they often rely on he…
“When people lack expertise to evaluate the science behind something complex (i.e. climate science), they often rely on heuristics such as substituting judgment about something simple and are therefore vulnerable to misleading information” https://t.co/cf0
@ShaleCreekRanch this one might help you out too https://t.co/EiPPRiYog5
Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors https://t.co/OPboRJuJaF via @IOPscience Study this and use it to help end climate denial.
@glezjuanje Relacionado con ello... https://t.co/ixGpE98Sce
¿Cómo deconstruyendo la desinformación del #cambioclimático? El argumento "El clima ha cambiado en el pasado." https://t.co/Pm9xwE6HSe @Divulgameteo @ClimaGroupUB @aeclim @climatologia_ua @climayagua https://t.co/3YaHnyOqIr
video abstracts! about science communication! using climate change arguments! If anyone ever wants to do one of these for their research I volunteer to produce it! https://t.co/IzLMUJhO2U
RT @GerritRentier: Analyse van redeneerfouten #climatedenial; dat er in het verleden natuurlijke #klimaat-verandering op trad zegt niet dat…
@andreas_lieb @TerliWetter @RoHeAss @johnfocook In der Tat! Zum Beispiel die Studie "Deconstructing Climate Misinformation to identify reasoning errors": https://t.co/ANRBPT0nd6 Es gibt ein tolles - und lustiges - Video-Abstrakt zur Studie: https://t.co/yI
@BobbiePoPS @Tom_Hardwicke @RichieLenne @psforscher @NeilLewisJr @nmmichalak @minzlicht @hardsci @lakens @jayvanbavel @KojiJTaka @HeatherUrry This piece might be useful: deploying the scientific method to boost inoculation to scientific misinformation. And
@bradfordjhurley @KHayhoe Not sure that's literally true. They may have adopted that position by default or from authority or by logical mistake. That's not to say there aren't blinkered motivated reasoners out there where we should discuss the motivation.
RT @AukeHoekstra: This VIDEO abstract of an article on climate disinformation is hilarious! It's also extremely informative. I applaud the…
RT @AukeHoekstra: This VIDEO abstract of an article on climate disinformation is hilarious! It's also extremely informative. I applaud the…
RT @AukeHoekstra: This VIDEO abstract of an article on climate disinformation is hilarious! It's also extremely informative. I applaud the…