Considerations for AI-EO for agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), March 2023
Catherine Nakalembe, Hannah Kerner
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||38||72%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||11%|
|Lecturer > Senior Lecturer||1||6%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Business, Management and Accounting||2||11%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,892,887 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
of 5,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 408,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,892,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.