↓ Skip to main content

IOP Publishing

Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 6,174)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
900 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1663 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
Title
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), May 2013
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
Authors

John Cook, Dana Nuccitelli, Sarah A Green, Mark Richardson, Bärbel Winkler, Rob Painting, Robert Way, Peter Jacobs, Andrew Skuce

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,379 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,663 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 <1%
Australia 7 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Other 13 <1%
Unknown 1603 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 311 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 284 17%
Student > Bachelor 265 16%
Researcher 212 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 77 5%
Other 225 14%
Unknown 289 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 234 14%
Social Sciences 172 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 168 10%
Engineering 125 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 109 7%
Other 491 30%
Unknown 364 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5298. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2024.
All research outputs
#753
of 26,168,182 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#2
of 6,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3
of 208,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,168,182 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.