| Title |
Assessing fossil fuel CO2 emissions in California using atmospheric observations and models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/aabd43 |
| Authors |
H Graven, M L Fischer, T Lueker, S Jeong, T P Guilderson, R F Keeling, R Bambha, K Brophy, W Callahan, X Cui, C Frankenberg, K R Gurney, B W LaFranchi, S J Lehman, H Michelsen, J B Miller, S Newman, W Paplawsky, N C Parazoo, C Sloop, S J Walker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Sweden | 1 | 13% |
| Finland | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Denmark | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2018.
All research outputs
#415,077
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#637
of 6,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,038
of 345,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#28
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.