| Title |
Early retirement of power plants in climate mitigation scenarios
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/ab96d3 |
| Authors |
Robert Fofrich, Dan Tong, Katherine Calvin, Harmen Sytze De Boer, Johannes Emmerling, Oliver Fricko, Shinichiro Fujimori, Gunnar Luderer, Joeri Rogelj, Steven J Davis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 29% |
| France | 6 | 8% |
| Japan | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 62% |
| Scientists | 27 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 10 | 12% |
| Energy | 7 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 41 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#481,886
of 24,721,757 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#744
of 5,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,470
of 404,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#40
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,721,757 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.