↓ Skip to main content

IOP Publishing

Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
601 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
5 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
Title
Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), February 2018
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa49f
Authors

John Cook, Peter Ellerton, David Kinkead

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 601 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 288 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 17%
Researcher 46 16%
Student > Master 29 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Professor 13 5%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 82 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 35 12%
Social Sciences 31 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 9%
Psychology 19 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 5%
Other 69 24%
Unknown 95 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 580. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#43,613
of 26,744,825 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#77
of 6,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#965
of 452,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#3
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,744,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.