↓ Skip to main content

IOP Publishing

Article Metrics

Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 4,605)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
649 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
5 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), February 2018
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa49f
Authors

John Cook, Peter Ellerton, David Kinkead

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 649 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 172 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 24%
Researcher 34 20%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Professor 9 5%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 23 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 31 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 13%
Social Sciences 17 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Psychology 12 7%
Other 41 24%
Unknown 35 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 593. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#23,028
of 18,964,669 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#38
of 4,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#765
of 383,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#2
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,964,669 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.