↓ Skip to main content

IOP Publishing

Article Metrics

Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 4,265)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
637 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
5 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), February 2018
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa49f
Authors

John Cook, Peter Ellerton, David Kinkead

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 637 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 26%
Researcher 30 20%
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Professor 8 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 29 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 13%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Psychology 9 6%
Other 40 26%
Unknown 29 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 575. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#21,553
of 17,651,001 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#32
of 4,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#779
of 375,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#2
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,651,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.