↓ Skip to main content

IOP Publishing

Article Metrics

Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 4,080)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
637 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
5 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), February 2018
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa49f
Authors

John Cook, Peter Ellerton, David Kinkead

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 637 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 27%
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Professor 8 6%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 14%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Psychology 9 6%
Other 38 27%
Unknown 26 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 572. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2020.
All research outputs
#20,516
of 17,067,437 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#32
of 4,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#782
of 373,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#4
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,067,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.