↓ Skip to main content

IOP Publishing

Article Metrics

Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 5,159)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
693 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
5 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), February 2018
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa49f
Authors

John Cook, Peter Ellerton, David Kinkead

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 693 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 201 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 22%
Researcher 37 18%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Professor 9 4%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 33 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 35 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 12%
Social Sciences 21 10%
Psychology 16 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Other 49 24%
Unknown 44 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 620. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2022.
All research outputs
#25,961
of 21,436,792 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#49
of 5,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#741
of 400,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#4
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,436,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.