RT @skepticscience: #15 We create resources like animated GIFs of myth deconstructions to help with the debunking of climate-related misinf…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

@klimainitiative Für diese Behauptung haben wir auf @skepticscience übrigens seit Kurzem eine logikbasierte Widerlegung als animiertes GIF und Schritt für Schritt Erklärung https://t.co/ld9Hd5quEr Inspiriert von der Studie https://t.co/ssmdHlAtOw https://t

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @BaerbelW: Die Studie "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/ssmdHlAtOw) von @johnfocook, @d…

RT @BaerbelW: Die Studie "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/ssmdHlAtOw) von @johnfocook, @d…

💚👍Sehr schön gemacht.

🧵von @skepticscience zur englischen Version https://t.co/Z73aA1so38

Die Studie "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/ssmdHlAtOw) von @johnfocook, @davekinkead & @Reasondisabled inspirierte die Erstellung logikbasierter Widerlegungen einiger Klimamythen als animierte GIFs. h

RT @skepticscience: #15 We create resources like animated GIFs of myth deconstructions to help with the debunking of climate-related misinf…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

Myths.

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @AlainLetour: Liste impressionnante de sophismes utilisés dans le déni du changement climatique.

RT @AlainLetour: Liste impressionnante de sophismes utilisés dans le déni du changement climatique.

RT @AlainLetour: Liste impressionnante de sophismes utilisés dans le déni du changement climatique.

Liste impressionnante de sophismes utilisés dans le déni du changement climatique.

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

#15 We create resources like animated GIFs of myth deconstructions to help with the debunking of climate-related misinformation: https://t.co/ROVqhgjJnD

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @DavidSalesaD: Hilo con explicaciones de porqué las falacias climáticas no son argumentos válidos con 9 ejemplos típicos 👇

Hilo con explicaciones de porqué las falacias climáticas no son argumentos válidos con 9 ejemplos típicos 👇

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @NienkeHaan: Hoewel misleidende claims in de categorieën 'klimaatwetenschap & -beweging zijn onbetrouwbaar' of 'voorgestelde oplossingen…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @NienkeHaan: Hoewel misleidende claims in de categorieën 'klimaatwetenschap & -beweging zijn onbetrouwbaar' of 'voorgestelde oplossingen…

Hoewel misleidende claims in de categorieën 'klimaatwetenschap & -beweging zijn onbetrouwbaar' of 'voorgestelde oplossingen werken niet' vaker voorkomen, komen claims in de cat. klimaatverandering is niet echt, niet erg of niet onze schuld ook nog rege

Great resource to counter misinformation on #ClimateChange! Unfortunately, I have the feeling the pointing to their wrong premises and false logic will not stop climate change deniers to spread lies and misinformation 🫤

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

Myth deconstruction til næste gang du render ind i argumenter som 👇🏼

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

I love this resource! I've been deconstructing myths in my class for a few years using the framework published by @johnfocook and colleagues for some time. These graphics will help this process a lot! Thanks!

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

RT @skepticscience: The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook…

The paper "Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" (https://t.co/wOezrlRPMC) by @johnfocook, @davekinkead & @Reasondisabled inspired the creation of a new graphics resource category for myth deconstructions as animated GIFs

@Joffrey77855104 Die gängigen Desinformationsstrategien von Klimawandelleugnern sind inzwischen ein wissenschaftlich gut beschriebenes Phänomen, z.B.: https://t.co/wanhmdTZ61

RT @LuluLemew: 🔥#Inoculationtheory offers one approach to effectively neutralize the influence of #misinformation Research: https://t.co/A…

RT @LuluLemew: 🔥#Inoculationtheory offers one approach to effectively neutralize the influence of #misinformation Research: https://t.co/A…

🔥#Inoculationtheory offers one approach to effectively neutralize the influence of #misinformation Research: https://t.co/ASRwBBXYJe https://t.co/RQzXl416y2

We made the video as a video abstract for our critical thinking research published in @IOPenvironment - we developed a step-by-step methodology for deconstructing & analysing misinformation in order to identify reasoning fallacies https://t.co/mKSdVgeK

@mcnisbet @cboussalis @MaxMossler @AEI @RogerPielkeJr It requires bringing in other disciplines like critical thinking philosophy - work I've done with @Reasondisabled & @davekinkead to use critical thinking to deconstruct & identify reasoning fall

RT @johnfocook: @GreenJimll @SciReports @TravisCoan1 @cboussalis We explain in the paper that what we’ve done is document what contrarian s…

@RogerPielkeJr "..we propose inoculating against misinformation by explaining the fallacious reasoning within misleading denialist claims. " https://t.co/th8U9kr0eu

RT @gri_mm: Gegen Fake News helfen keine Fakten, so die "inoculation theory", sondern detailliertes Auseinander-Nehmen der logischen Fehler…

RT @gri_mm: Gegen Fake News helfen keine Fakten, so die "inoculation theory", sondern detailliertes Auseinander-Nehmen der logischen Fehler…

RT @gri_mm: Gegen Fake News helfen keine Fakten, so die "inoculation theory", sondern detailliertes Auseinander-Nehmen der logischen Fehler…

RT @gri_mm: Gegen Fake News helfen keine Fakten, so die "inoculation theory", sondern detailliertes Auseinander-Nehmen der logischen Fehler…

RT @gri_mm: Gegen Fake News helfen keine Fakten, so die "inoculation theory", sondern detailliertes Auseinander-Nehmen der logischen Fehler…

RT @gri_mm: Gegen Fake News helfen keine Fakten, so die "inoculation theory", sondern detailliertes Auseinander-Nehmen der logischen Fehler…

RT @gri_mm: Gegen Fake News helfen keine Fakten, so die "inoculation theory", sondern detailliertes Auseinander-Nehmen der logischen Fehler…

Gegen Fake News helfen keine Fakten, so die "inoculation theory", sondern detailliertes Auseinander-Nehmen der logischen Fehler in den Argumenten. https://t.co/ewXhUwIzBr

@juhariis We're already working on combining our machine learning research with our critical thinking research (https://t.co/mKSdVgeKSH). I haven't even started to think about how we might combine that with my @crankyuncles research using humor & games

@GreenJimll @SciReports @TravisCoan1 @cboussalis We explain in the paper that what we’ve done is document what contrarian sources claim, not whether their claims are valid. Assessing whether their claims are valid is a different task which @Reasondisabled,

@bullsinvests Bt EWE: Typically, inoculations convey resistance by providing people with information that counters misinformation. In contrast, we propose inoculating against misinformation by explaining the fallacious reasoning within misleading denialis

"Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors" https://t.co/nMOIdLZ1Yo

@Il_Principe1982 @johnredwood Bt EWE: Typically, inoculations convey resistance by providing people with information that counters misinformation. In contrast, we propose inoculating against misinformation by explaining the fallacious reasoning within mis

@TomChivers @TamarHaspel @cp_elevated @unherd Categories are just a way of organising or making sense of misinformation. You can cut to the heart of misinforming arguments via critical thinking methods, as @Reasondisabled, @davekinkead & I do in identi

Oh dear- move on buffoon https://t.co/OMl3Fmg3Mt

#auspol This paper by Cook has nothing to do with climate but the nature of the argument. To place it in the title is ethically wrong although its possible to argue also about ethics >https://t.co/Cp8ngwbVOa

@aSinister @TrevorDKidd1 @texas_US_proud @6lennybravo @hardtimehardta1 @Havenaar64 @CanadianSence @biffmack @RushhourP @insane_voice @IngersolRobert @ClimatePatriot @d_e_mol @MikeDel21893959 @AltYelloNatPark @_Ratzz_ @brandondaly2018 @Canadadb @GeraldKutne

#auspol This paper by Cook has environment and climate in the title but has absolutely nothing to do with environment but about the logical deduction process in psychology. Why would he put it there? >https://t.co/qmdtnsr5wC

@BaerbelW @Spencerfletch0 @JR4_Truth @TomPlesier @Kenneth72712993 @jefftonna1 @BarbaraGirouard @Alan_jones55 @Veritatem2021 @DawnTJ90 @eachus @JohnDublin10 @DocSnow1 @BradPKeyes @automatrix66_KC @insane_voice @CryptoPaul68 @LouisCy72344053 @ejwwest @SoCalB

RT @Veritatem2021: John Cook published the 2013 junk "science" 97% consensus paper and created the Skeptical Science website which has desc…

RT @Veritatem2021: John Cook published the 2013 junk "science" 97% consensus paper and created the Skeptical Science website which has desc…

RT @Veritatem2021: John Cook published the 2013 junk "science" 97% consensus paper and created the Skeptical Science website which has desc…

RT @Veritatem2021: John Cook published the 2013 junk "science" 97% consensus paper and created the Skeptical Science website which has desc…

RT @Veritatem2021: John Cook published the 2013 junk "science" 97% consensus paper and created the Skeptical Science website which has desc…

RT @Veritatem2021: John Cook published the 2013 junk "science" 97% consensus paper and created the Skeptical Science website which has desc…

RT @Veritatem2021: John Cook published the 2013 junk "science" 97% consensus paper and created the Skeptical Science website which has desc…

John Cook published the 2013 junk "science" 97% consensus paper and created the Skeptical Science website which has descended into the cesspit of blacklisting scientists who are AGW sceptics in an attempt to destroy their careers and reputations. You adm

@Kenneth72712993 @jefftonna1 @BarbaraGirouard @Alan_jones55 @Veritatem2021 @DawnTJ90 @eachus @JohnDublin10 @DocSnow1 @BaerbelW @BradPKeyes @automatrix66_KC @insane_voice @CryptoPaul68 @LouisCy72344053 @ejwwest @SoCalBohoGal @drochir_thonnuk @JR4_Truth @Tom

@Spencerfletch0 @JR4_Truth @TomPlesier @Kenneth72712993 @jefftonna1 @BarbaraGirouard @Alan_jones55 @Veritatem2021 @DawnTJ90 @eachus @JohnDublin10 @DocSnow1 @BradPKeyes @automatrix66_KC @insane_voice @CryptoPaul68 @LouisCy72344053 @ejwwest @SoCalBohoGal @dr

@Tangomitteckel @JackJsherebkin @wilescape @insane_voice @KendoNagasaki7 @Lo_VVriter @Artannes @ejwwest @bobathon @orielking1 @borngeek @Richard16022464 @Veritatem2021 @Spencerfletch0 @Tec_Ambientali @drochir_thonnuk @gustavocevallo @TurtleFL @Bazthebemuse

@KittyMiau16 @RegSprecher Vielleicht noch das: https://t.co/showBkjuiW Das kleine Video reicht zum reinkommen. Der Rest is auch gut. Für die Übersetzung sehr gut geeignet. https://t.co/s4YuFy582K

@GreenFireHVAC @HelenJackson0 @cboussalis @tcddublin @UniofExeter As for assessing the veracity of climate denialist claims, I do this with @Reasondisabled & @davekinkead in https://t.co/mKSdVgwmhh, where we deconstruct & identify reasoning fallaci

On Dec 15, I'll also be releasing Critical Thinking Cafe 2, a sequel to our 2018 Critical Thinking Cafe, the video abstract to https://t.co/mKSdVgwmhh https://t.co/bdD1mrd33I

RT @johnfocook: My next step was developing a way to identify rhetorical techniques & logical fallacies in misinformation. For this, I turn…

RT @johnfocook: My next step was developing a way to identify rhetorical techniques & logical fallacies in misinformation. For this, I turn…

RT @johnfocook: My next step was developing a way to identify rhetorical techniques & logical fallacies in misinformation. For this, I turn…

@DanCady @johnfocook Yes there are times I am dragged into the mud with them as well as it seems that is the only level they converse on. @johnfocook has done a lot of work on inoculation methodology: https://t.co/9eYjqiNCNj https://t.co/pJbMu02VWe http

My next step was developing a way to identify rhetorical techniques & logical fallacies in misinformation. For this, I turned to critical thinking philosophers @reasondisabled & @davekinkead (full video @ https://t.co/m7XTQq5WAZ, full paper @ https

This was a great paper and one I used a lot when teaching about climate change to my ecology students!