@blancs_TX @GeoeWatchDebunk @Joespha1981 @mikejacobsen99 I've read lots of papers on potential SRM geoengineering. None on ACTUAL SRM geoengineering. Experts say trails are just contrails. https://t.co/i56OGm00F5
Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/joQKhGuHph
@RegimeChangeBC Contrail & Atmosphere Deposition Experts say there is NO evidence supporting Chemtrail theories: https://t.co/5dxcuMG7X8
@EDocet @usal @usal ¿por qué no mejor informar de esto https://t.co/7T22ondErS ?
@Robyperr64 ... dell'esistenza di un vasto programma segreto di irrorazione chimica siano valide: https://t.co/iT4hsHXl2N Nel mio piccolo mantengo %
@SibstLP @CreepyMC_YT Das Problem ist halt, dass du z.B. die Meinung eines Stadtrates der von 76 Experten bevorzugst https://t.co/YhPFbaC4jd
RT @KenCaldeira: @GeoeWatchDebunk @pbump Note that disinformation site Infowars promotes the nutty #chemtrails conspiracy theory. https://t…
RT @KenCaldeira: @GeoeWatchDebunk @pbump Note that disinformation site Infowars promotes the nutty #chemtrails conspiracy theory. https://t…
RT @KenCaldeira: @GeoeWatchDebunk @pbump Note that disinformation site Infowars promotes the nutty #chemtrails conspiracy theory. https://t…
@GeoeWatchDebunk @pbump Note that disinformation site Infowars promotes the nutty #chemtrails conspiracy theory. https://t.co/dy1DIWNxvC https://t.co/PVYmz6vm39
@BiosferaSOS La evidencia científica juega en vuestra contra https://t.co/zvxIVCRe3v
@MikeStuchbery_ Here's the original research paper: https://t.co/CbDeYehhgL
Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying pr.. https://t.co/V6pfu5EDUr by @IOPscience
@AHSmithandSons @Kent_Online Probably just a bit of harmless climate or mind control. https://t.co/Rr9mhrWA6G
Thx but #disagree chemtrails=geoengineering: https://t.co/gzFdAwLJWi https://t.co/cCEBIGiNw2 https://t.co/FyGS6GSVQy https://t.co/kDloXPbYvj https://t.co/sNNC9P2JhP
@disinformatico @m_bellitti @bIasc0 @totir68 Infine, la controprova recente che NON esiste nessun fantomatico "dibattito" sulla "geoingegneria clandestina": https://t.co/iT4hsHXl2N
@napulegno79 @Mary70more @ClaudioDeglinn2 Senza offesa, contano le argomentazioni non i voti da opinione. E non sono "unico": https://t.co/iT4hsHFJEd
Ig-Nobelpreis-verdächtig: US-Forscher ermitteln, dass 98,7% der Experten behaupten, nichts von Chemtrails zu wissen. https://t.co/QWYrDbivao
anyone wanna start about chemtrails while we're at it? ok. https://t.co/BGnj54Ly7n https://t.co/bKOnclDl0a https://t.co/qJwfkyFFP3
RT @RealGeoEngWatch: @haydenpanettier @kencaldeira is a primary actor in the ongoing climate coverup, FYI https://t.co/zNmMPwxwZA https://t…
RT RealGeoEngWatch: haydenpanettier kencaldeira is a primary actor in the ongoing climate coverup, FYI … https://t.co/CUPbVjWsy4
RT @RealGeoEngWatch: @haydenpanettier @kencaldeira is a primary actor in the ongoing climate coverup, FYI https://t.co/zNmMPwxwZA https://t…
RT @RealGeoEngWatch: @haydenpanettier @kencaldeira is a primary actor in the ongoing climate coverup, FYI https://t.co/zNmMPwxwZA https://t…
Quantifying expert consensus against existence of secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/XN8bGPXYIT via @IOPscience
Stichwort #Chemtrails: Hier geht's direkt zur zitierten Studie des "Environmental Research Letter" https://t.co/7q5SzofkZz
RT @RealGeoEngWatch: @haydenpanettier @kencaldeira is a primary actor in the ongoing climate coverup, FYI https://t.co/zNmMPwxwZA https://t…
@avellino53 ad es. ecco il parere degli scienziati sulla faccenda: https://t.co/iT4hsHXl2N (se mastichi inglese, cmq puoi usare google sull'abstract)
RT @hausfath: @WeatherWar101 Others with far more patience than I have already (effectively) did: https://t.co/yKlnIOotLJ
RT @hausfath: @WeatherWar101 Others with far more patience than I have already (effectively) did: https://t.co/yKlnIOotLJ
@WeatherWar101 Others with far more patience than I have already (effectively) did: https://t.co/yKlnIOotLJ
@haydenpanettier @kencaldeira is a primary actor in the ongoing climate coverup, FYI https://t.co/zNmMPwxwZA https://t.co/WpcFfZDjYy
RT @KenCaldeira: .@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https:…
RT @KenCaldeira: .@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https:…
RT @KenCaldeira: .@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https:…
Hablan ahora de este articulo https://t.co/d9IiPgQa9G
RT @KenCaldeira: .@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https:…
RT @KenCaldeira: .@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https:…
RT @KenCaldeira: .@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https:…
RT @KenCaldeira: .@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https:…
RT @KenCaldeira: .@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https:…
RT @KenCaldeira: .@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https:…
RT @KenCaldeira: .@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https:…
RT @KenCaldeira: .@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https:…
RT @KenCaldeira: .@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https:…
RT @KenCaldeira: .@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https:…
RT @KenCaldeira: .@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https:…
RT @KenCaldeira: .@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https:…
.@haydenpanettier Please talk to real scientists about contrails & avoid propagating unfounded conspiracy theories. https://t.co/dy1DIWNxvC https://t.co/NGgTYP9IEB
Please read a proper scientific article: https://t.co/0cj41GZcFM @vbriggs07
Every science field deserves its own wacky conspiracy! In cloud research it's 'chemtrails' https://t.co/diinYV8R9m paper by @ChristineSheare
@wordbird67 massive peer reviewed study 'they' wont like https://t.co/ROweO5I9xh
RT @suzettepetillo: @davidf4444 in the last link https://t.co/9bX73v1rUL full referenced text 2016
#realfacts vs #alternitivefacts: Debunking a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/py822IVQzV via @IOPscience
@EduBzgz1 @MeteoSE Mira, te dejo un paper sobre la negación de los chemtrails de un gran número de cientificos https://t.co/LRgcj4TKiU
Une lecture (de l'été 2016). https://t.co/PkX5Ur6Bda https://t.co/2ri2ULNow4
Habrá que traducirlo. Pero, aún así, será interpretado como parte del complot. https://t.co/WX0eZl6pql
Ciencia versus pensamiento mágico sobre manipulación de la lluvia. https://t.co/YBiWVDraqY
RT @pjvanerp: Dutch Party for the Animals changes position on chemtrails after reading https://t.co/Baju7ZyBvo @MickWest https://t.co/KMMCT…
Dutch Party for the Animals changes position on chemtrails after reading https://t.co/Baju7ZyBvo @MickWest https://t.co/KMMCTvILiB
@Lawrence_Cheuk @LRoorda @PartijvdDieren Onafhankelijk onderzoek: https://t.co/OEBhMdX9Kz (En zeg niet 'er is verdeeldheid' bij 76-1)
For all you “chemtrail” conspiracy theorists out there https://t.co/fbYQoLbA57 November 21, 2016, 3:13 pm --- https://t.co/y3ZiXfWvKi https://t.co/Inac5IUU4D
@Kolyin @Reason4Reason @center4inquiry Discussion and link to paper. https://t.co/vDen4d5nJM https://t.co/i56OGm00F5
Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmosp… https://t.co/cr6vHW4K7F ケムトレイルに対する専門家の意識調査で、初の査読付き論文だとさ。
Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/XtzSdR8bnK @IOPscience
Guess what, scientists agree that the chemtrail conspiracy is... just a conspiracy https://t.co/UBDzP9Aggf via @IOPscience
Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/waXlSwumvj @IOPscience
@Neuro_Skeptic don't know if you saw, but this one was also retracted! https://t.co/6uEQLMLJen see also: https://t.co/orr0lr6qN5
uff qué alivio!! Expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/v3Dg88NQVs
RT @RationalWiki: First peer-reviewed study into chemtrails! writeup: https://t.co/nyLoWmD4Cy paper: https://t.co/lwc8usK67A
I encourage you to read this: https://t.co/nPrWil5HDI @BayleeB1979 @KittenKoder @TakeThatScapeGt
Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-/ https://t.co/k7EeiHirmC #Geoengineering #climate #PublicPerception
Chemtrails: a SLAP in the face for conspiracy theorists https://t.co/96VysEg8zV via @IOPscience
RT @MedBunker: Sondaggio scie chimiche: il 17% delle persone ci crede, il 99% degli scienziati non ne ha evidenza. Curioso, no? :) https://…
A "NIST" report of environmental Science? Mainstream Science responds to Geo-Engineering claims. https://t.co/xjm3FTT2Mt via @IOPscience
.@curryja I'd be very interested to hear your opinion on this recently published 'peer reviewed' paper https://t.co/gTvaXH40nJ
consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/ebJsUw4xlB via @IOPscience
Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/YyadCQliqp
RT @scimednet: Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/G0ddKH…
RT @scimednet: This is the report generated from the first ever scientific investigation (largely by survey) into the popular... https://t.…
Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/G0ddKHJlBu
This is the report generated from the first ever scientific investigation (largely by survey) into the popular... https://t.co/MOEGhMsJa8
#Chemtrails finns inte #miljö #vetenskap Quantifying expert consensus against chemtrails https://t.co/2Fr2g9kGgF
"Quantifying expert consensus against a secret large-scale atmospheric spraying program" https://t.co/vxCwtlu0Np c @_infoLibre @A_Valenzuela
Everything about this study is just wrong.. not the answers from the experts but the way they go about it..Why... https://t.co/JCGcyvQEcV
La verdad sobre los #Chemtrails: No hay ningún complot para fumigarnos, esterilizarnos o cambiar el clima en secreto https://t.co/ZCbki7hQRH
https://t.co/JBObNQEStl via @IOPscience
77 experts in atmospheric/soils Chemistry took-on the Chemtrails bull https://t.co/7yiODn3mNk Game Over! #Chemistry https://t.co/xVpaicJoWw
Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/H7SXQlFpnq @IOPscience
RT @JoseM_SGP: Chemtrails: Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https:/…
Ja gut, dann lese ich das Paper halt auch mal ... https://t.co/5zBRkofj6W #chemtrails
Mit Peer Review-Artikel gegen Chemtrails argumentieren: Ein Kampf mit Windmühlen? https://t.co/tmgg39dSyX https://t.co/txh9Tbc4B4
RT @PhysicsCentral: Scientists: "Please shut up about chemtrails already, there are actual environmental atrocities going on right now." ht…
RT @PhysicsCentral: Scientists: "Please shut up about chemtrails already, there are actual environmental atrocities going on right now." ht…
Scientists: "Please shut up about chemtrails already, there are actual environmental atrocities going on right now." https://t.co/7hbpx3KUXq
@Kal1_Furies @dean_anonym Yes, q are linked in the paper: https://t.co/i56OGm00F5 https://t.co/hqhU9RSPWU https://t.co/R7t6z0LLLY
Y asi es como se hace un articulo cientifico. https://t.co/z0LD17hGNR vía @IOPscience