RT @sleemajd: @GeneVatow should read ON AIR- "A SLAP across the face of Conspiracy Theorists as 'experts' deny #Chemtrails" #F2B 🙈 https://…

@GeneVatow should read ON AIR- "A SLAP across the face of Conspiracy Theorists as 'experts' deny #Chemtrails" #F2B 🙈 https://t.co/y1gNSu7hHC

Nearly 17% of respondents in an international survey believe chemtrails exist https://t.co/aCTF6xTU40

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/apVbNX8Eht

From the "Well, duh!"-department: Huge bunch of scientists confirm "chemtrails" don't exist. https://t.co/THZYFFPN2O Probably won't help.

RT @RadioProzac: Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of #chemtrails https://t.co/uaejBTLAYP https://t.co/BKnFPhlmNy

Chemtrails är alltså en bluff. Men hur är det med foliehattar? https://t.co/571Hwlp3bU via @IOPscience

@zeitonline Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/Ve0RJyclQc

@TeddingtonTAG @NATSPressOffice https://t.co/hS78yhL2re

98.7% of scientists think chemtrails are bullshit. We have no idea why that number is so low. https://t.co/NWiXwiau90

RT @JoseM_SGP: Chemtrails: Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https:/…

@janboehm hier mal ein wissenschaftlicher standpunkt: #chemtrails sind bloß kondensstreifen https://t.co/CLsP7Y4HcQ

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of #chemtrails https://t.co/uaejBTLAYP https://t.co/BKnFPhlmNy

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/dMNVlD2F3M @IOPscience

Chemtrails https://t.co/CSDEUKrQId

Scientists actually did a study on Chemtrails. Their conclusion, you're all conspiracy theorists, it's condensatio… https://t.co/jDDrBpdYtt

@BrandonDoughan @TheCollapsedPsi https://t.co/ZUbtZmf0Yk nice timing!

Se qualcuno lo volesse leggere in inglese, un articolo dell'Università di Irvine, California sulle #sciechimiche https://t.co/2kxSzE4JY5

@Scientificast @AngioniSimone E se fosse la parola fine ai blateramenti degli #sciakazzari? #Diovolesse! https://t.co/2kxSzE4JY5

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying. https://t.co/LltWkAfkVQ via @IOPscience

@angelopaz5 R.I.P. #chemtrail conspiracy ☠⚰🔚 https://t.co/2kxSzE4JY5

@LFCacManager @NATSPressOffice recently someone made a paper for you to read explaining why this is not true - https://t.co/hS78yhL2re

RT @KelseyMcEwen: Sorry folks! Science says contrails are NOT part of a conspiracy. Full study here: https://t.co/TqkdPRCcLC https://t.co/3…

@Zett @janboehm -> "Q. expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program" https://t.co/Ve0RJyclQc

RT @JoseM_SGP: Chemtrails: Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https:/…

RT @rpierronnet: Une étude scientifique sur laquelle s’appuyer pour lutter contre la théorie complotiste des « chemtrails » https://t.co/h7…

Que no, que los chemtrails no existen. Ya hasta probado científicamente... https://t.co/XWHJCXHGoM

Chemtrails: Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/ipmDBdWvUg

RT @rpierronnet: Une étude scientifique sur laquelle s’appuyer pour lutter contre la théorie complotiste des « chemtrails » https://t.co/h7…

Une étude scientifique sur laquelle s’appuyer pour lutter contre la théorie complotiste des « chemtrails » https://t.co/h7kgAxw7Bz

Expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/DS0IRmpbQ5 vía @IOPscience

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/g2i4cYvoXX

Die Ergebnisse zum Thema #Chemtrails : Environmental Research Letters - https://t.co/CucC3wovEJ

Sorry folks! Science says contrails are NOT part of a conspiracy. Full study here: https://t.co/TqkdPRCcLC https://t.co/3n9A1iZIcj

RT @BeaHervella: 76 de 77 investigadores de física atmosférica no ven conspiración en los #chemtrails según este estudio https://t.co/GbkK…

RT @BeaHervella: 76 de 77 investigadores de física atmosférica no ven conspiración en los #chemtrails según este estudio https://t.co/GbkK…

76 de 77 investigadores de física atmosférica no ven conspiración en los #chemtrails según este estudio https://t.co/GbkKJUEngE

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/DFOsyonpPc @IOPscience

Tomándose en serio las teorías de la conspiración para descartarlas https://t.co/mUI5OjI4ZE

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/tYBs2I2cOj

Quantifying expert consensus vs the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/nzv4wpWGWm via @IOPscience

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-/ https://t.co/CaSrdDuQIR #Geoengineering #climate #PublicPerception

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence ofasecretlarge-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/BQZCB59XD3 via @IOPscience

Consensus : 99% des experts ne pensent pas que les #chemtrails et les manipulations climatiques existent https://t.co/IlyWXbM1EU

https://t.co/W3eRFrjLPk

@SchrodingerJr Estudio original en el que se nombra a todos los científicos por si quieres comprobarlo en un futuro https://t.co/1avNBVLvze

Expert consensus against the existence of chemtrails https://t.co/pUftJ6bGqz via @IOPscience

RT @Milnesium: Quantifier le consensus scientifique sur les argumts qui réfutent les #Chemtrails #complot https://t.co/FFX63XntMY https://t…

Quantifier le consensus scientifique sur les argumts qui réfutent les #Chemtrails #complot https://t.co/FFX63XntMY https://t.co/C2KgcOpIKm

https://t.co/c9MJ6vz3m6 VS #chemtrails finally some researcer do a really good study and now #stop please!

RT @GodlessEngineer: A study was done to shut up chem trail people... it's sad a study had to be done on this... https://t.co/by65IHSGS5

RT @JPeterBurger: Studie naar chemtrails: van 77 chemische experts zeggen 76 dat ze niet bestaan https://t.co/yPxYV7x0kR (h/t @spiekerdijk6)

A study was done to shut up chem trail people... it's sad a study had to be done on this... https://t.co/by65IHSGS5

A paper on Chemtrail https://t.co/PbxIGzfvdY

@jimmyc42 isn't that what chemtrails are for https://t.co/focRDmXl3V

Quantifying expert consensus against existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/HczndWF3xY via @IOPscience

In case anyone of my followers are unlucky enough to be related to or count as friend a chemtrailer https://t.co/bDjzc41SBN

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/PaeHi5jnly tl;dr Nope

RT @acad_sup: #Chemtrails: Es gibt keine Beweise. Der erste wissenschaftliche Fachartikel zur Verschwörungstheorie im Volltext: https://t.c…

RT @acad_sup: #Chemtrails: Es gibt keine Beweise. Der erste wissenschaftliche Fachartikel zur Verschwörungstheorie im Volltext: https://t.c…

#Chemtrails: Es gibt keine Beweise. Der erste wissenschaftliche Fachartikel zur Verschwörungstheorie im Volltext: https://t.co/Ka98Zmq3D5

Studie naar chemtrails: van 77 chemische experts zeggen 76 dat ze niet bestaan https://t.co/yPxYV7x0kR (h/t @spiekerdijk6)

I don't care that 76 of 77 scientists say Chemtrails aren't a thing, I'm still not convinced: https://t.co/4BrPm74JM1

RT @gieszkanne: 98,7% der Wissenschaftler_innen, die sich thematisch damit befassen, sehen keinen Beweis für #Chemtrails. https://t.co/PyM8…

98,7% der Wissenschaftler_innen, die sich thematisch damit befassen, sehen keinen Beweis für #Chemtrails. https://t.co/PyM853lb8p

RT @DWD_klima: Was ist dran an #Chemtrails? Wissenschaftliche Studie unter https://t.co/3Lp0DLFwNQ. Auch @SPIEGELONLINE berichtet: https://…

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/AUsQP1Pg59

Was ist dran an #Chemtrails? Wissenschaftliche Studie unter https://t.co/3Lp0DLFwNQ. Auch @SPIEGELONLINE berichtet: https://t.co/oukbxBMMvC.

RT @MedBunker: Sondaggio scie chimiche: il 17% delle persone ci crede, il 99% degli scienziati non ne ha evidenza. Curioso, no? :) https://…

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/W6t7OELPes

RT @ozaed: @skeptiker_de @motherboard -> https://t.co/Ve0RJyclQc

RT @MedBunker: Sondaggio scie chimiche: il 17% delle persone ci crede, il 99% degli scienziati non ne ha evidenza. Curioso, no? :) https://…

RT @goldenesbrett: 76 von 77 befragten Experten, meinen, dass es keine #Chemtrails gibt. In der Bevölkerung sind es 16,6% https://t.co/FRqG…

@skeptiker_de @motherboard -> https://t.co/Ve0RJyclQc

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/FlAiFCpvo3

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying pro https://t.co/BV17rF1jbN via @IOPscience

RT @sdq0218: Quantifying consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/PLKSFgOk9a via…

Quantifying consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/PLKSFgOk9a via @IOPscience

There's straight up a scientific paper where experts were surveyed about the existence of chemtrails 😂 https://t.co/xncEDH04pQ

Experts consensus against existence of an active #chemtrails program offering no evidence https://t.co/Swvxkg1H4B https://t.co/l0nV1moHcq

15% of people & 76 out of 77 climate scientists say there is no such thing as 'chemtrails!' What do you think? https://t.co/haIe2j3dfQ

@EC_Kosters That sort of #chemtrails experience led us to do this study: https://t.co/CzbHHhbdSQ https://t.co/dy1DIX58Uc @scottbrison

RT @MedBunker: Sondaggio scie chimiche: il 17% delle persone ci crede, il 99% degli scienziati non ne ha evidenza. Curioso, no? :) https://…

@janboehm Ups da habe ich doch glatt meinen fundierten Wissenschaftsbericht gegen Chemtrails hier fallen gelassen https://t.co/omUtU0uexI

https://t.co/ckQC7y6FqY https://t.co/Ugakavvcw4

RT @MedBunker: Sondaggio scie chimiche: il 17% delle persone ci crede, il 99% degli scienziati non ne ha evidenza. Curioso, no? :) https://…

AHAHAHHAAHAHHAH MICK WEST AND KEN SHITHOLE CALDERIA..................AHAHAHHAHAH WHAT A FUCKING... https://t.co/RUQ750XoYQ

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of #chemtrails https://t.co/uaejBTLAYP https://t.co/KTVXeSzkEd

Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/l3JQGrSZmh #chemtrails

@Dan_E_V @HealthRanger @Pbzon Dd you read it? https://t.co/i56OGm00F5

RT @KenCaldeira: .@SteveDavisUCI made a web page about our recent paper on #chemtrails conspiracy theories. https://t.co/g3TAi7B5yW https:/…

@eddiebravo It's focussed on some specific claims of evidence, photos etc.. Check it out. https://t.co/i56OGm00F5 https://t.co/XHpbX1114N

RT @MedBunker: Sondaggio scie chimiche: il 17% delle persone ci crede, il 99% degli scienziati non ne ha evidenza. Curioso, no? :) https://…

Sondaggio scie chimiche: il 17% delle persone ci crede, il 99% degli scienziati non ne ha evidenza. Curioso, no? :) https://t.co/vl7YWuGMQD

RT @KenCaldeira: .@SteveDavisUCI made a web page about our recent paper on #chemtrails conspiracy theories. https://t.co/g3TAi7B5yW https:/…

(no) Surprise! #chemtrails are bullshit. inb4 crys of shills & cover up accusations. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ https://t.co/BYKTIlPJin

RT @TakeThatChem: The amount of work that needs to be done (and money spent) just to calm down the chemtrail nutters: https://t.co/nPrWiln…

@AstroKatie Related via beliefs in pseudoscience: Peer reviewed science vs chemtrail beliefs https://t.co/kNnTBpOkey

and the peer reviewed details of this investigation… https://t.co/i9qAOX2ih8 nice xx https://t.co/wQENae1IJb

Peer reviewed science vs chemtrail beliefs https://t.co/kNnTBpOkey @DoctorKarl