@CroireJosy @jsmag4 @Flobga Pas de soucis L'une des études scientifique réfutant l'hypothèse chemtrails: https://t.co/Yf3mreZByz
@KarlAlexPauls @MarinaGodanj Here they say SLAP, secret large-scale atmospheric program. Something weird from people who believe in conspiracy theories, if you call it in english that way. I just keep on laughing, because I´ve not heard from this theory be
@tiller4riller I've worked on one journal published paper. https://t.co/YQTbMQk1r5
@ma261053 @chamiteux Regardez en l'air ? C'est votre argumentation ? 🤨 https://t.co/XxPoOBNL3V Et j'arrête ici, à moins que ne vous soyez capable de me présenter une étude sérieuse, car en général les tenants de cette théorie sont pareils que les platistes
@russian71805090 @Oswald1160 @gamertaboo @gornalalbion I do a have a one published academic paper (I'm just a contributing author), but it was on chemtrails. https://t.co/YQTbMQk1r5 Still, the stuff I say about the videos is verifiable.
@tqmurdock @edwiebe There's actually the study from Shearer et al. (2016) about "chemtrails": Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/OIocr93k0l more here: https://t.co/2jbzfjhBH
@DatDamBatman @BBanon17 Hi Gotham. I like that you posted a citation to a journal 'opinion' article to apparently suggest that chemtrails are a baseless theory. However, I would disagree. The survey has flaws in its design (asks the wrong questions). htt
@BrueBste111 shhhhh... you're about to blow our cover! i hope no one reads this 2016 survey of atmospheric scientists graciously shooting down inane chemtrail conspiracy club theories: https://t.co/LwrEtf5YVo. https://t.co/fymjsleC4B
@Ciekaw0stki @Grzzawodnik1986 Szemrane strony i kanały z teoriami spiskowymi czy naukowe badania 🤔😉 https://t.co/mOCxFU4eJn
RT @tracemetalclean: @o_carlovan @MichaelEMann Chemtrails - not a thing, I and many other experts in the field weigh in here: Quantifying…
@Awnye4 @luvjbm @lbox327 @bendercock @Kt23kartracer Well, I've got good news for you. You don't have to move after all ( https://t.co/xAVAQYRlbD ), ( https://t.co/xrrajIUdcY ), ( https://t.co/t1WpDRUNPL ).
@bendercock @Awnye4 @lbox327 For example ( https://t.co/xAVAQYRlbD ), ( https://t.co/xrrajIUdcY ), or ( https://t.co/t1WpDRUNPL ). There is also common sense. The chemtrail conspiracy like the 911 conspiracy or the moon landing hoax conspiracy is unworkabl
@Deepneuron @zcichy @mikeb8637 @PostDisclosure @theyre_heeeere I know. I have my name on one peer-reviewed paper. The reviewers didn't find some errors. Didn't change the conclusion, but once it got a wide readership the errors were pointed out. I prefer s
@Freedomring2020 @TxEnergyBiz One anonymous source vs. a survey of atmospheric chemists and geochemists- I'll stick with my source for now- https://t.co/vOESj8R2bB
Survey says: chemtrails not a thing. https://t.co/NDaTqrOdPF @KenCaldeira @ChristineSheare /6
@martin558 @paulinegalway @cycle_bus Or maybe... https://t.co/SAurSoditC
RT @just1nbruce: Please take a few minutes to read the first peer-reviewed scientific paper about chemtrails from a couple years back. They…
I know you and all MSM have orders on how not to report poison jet chemtrials. Nough said !
Please take a few minutes to read the first peer-reviewed scientific paper about chemtrails from a couple years back. They’re fake. https://t.co/6dMqsFkQba
Do you also get lots of questions about airborne experiments and, yes, #conspiracy theories? These scientists have tried to answer those questions by measuring the scientific consensus on #chemtrails. A must read! https://t.co/NBOyTgnrPc @ECMWF @EUFAR_scie
Those are what we used to call "vapor trails" back in 50s. Now the scientific name is contrails, condensation trails, and there are more them because there is much more air traffic at varying altitudes. The science behind them is well understood. https://t
@schitzoziris Actually, you didn't. The video of what wasn't any official UN meeting didn't even mention chemtrails, and neither did your CSIRO link. No matter how many times you repeat this, they don't magically start mentioning chemtrails. As for my sour
RT @COMPLETE_ITN: Do you also get lots of questions about airborne experiments and, yes, #conspiracy theories? These scientists have tried…
Do you also get lots of questions about airborne experiments and, yes, #conspiracy theories? These scientists have tried to answer those questions by measuring the scientific consensus on #chemtrails. A must read! https://t.co/NBOyTgnrPc @PogodaMeteo @Met
@debunkdenialism There's also a published paper "Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program" https://t.co/6WgTP1NLGU With a discussion on Metabunk: https://t.co/JntY3HpZJW
Do you also get lots of questions about airborne experiments and, yes, #conspiracy theories? These scientists have tried to answer those questions by measuring the scientific consensus on #chemtrails. A must read! https://t.co/NBOyTgnrPc @InfoMeteoro @Pog
Do you also get lots of questions about airborne experiments and, yes, #conspiracy theories? These scientists have tried to answer those questions by measuring the scientific consensus on #chemtrails. A must read! https://t.co/NBOyTgnrPc @EarthandClouds @E
@JohnBGilman @chris_kissack https://t.co/Q7UWKInieA https://t.co/L2Fh3dWxMI I don't expect such references to change your mind, as it's pretty much impossible to disprove such theories. Rather, just know that there are far simpler explanations that don'
@naomirwolf @WeatheredHype It isn’t skepticism, it’s denialism. There is a very real difference. I’m tired of arguing with the flat eart, geoengineering, anti-vax, clinate denial nonsense. Here is a paper with great references. Read them. https://t.co/cYMN
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
RT @LaurelCoons: Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals…
Chemtrails Vs. Contrails: 🛩It’s easy to look at the white trail behind a jet aircraft and imagine all manner of chemicals raining down from above 🛩However, airplane contrails are simply what happens when jet engines burn fuel 🛩Con(densation)trails 👉htt
RT @MichaelEWebber: For my family members who believe in chemtrails, they ain't real. Nice work by @ChristineSheare @KenCaldeira @SteveDavi…
RT @MichaelEWebber: FYI, for the uninitiated, "chemtrails" are the idea that the gov't is spraying chemicals into the atmosphere to control…
RT @MichaelEWebber: For my family members who believe in chemtrails, they ain't real. Nice work by @ChristineSheare @KenCaldeira @SteveDavi…
RT @MichaelEWebber: For my family members who believe in chemtrails, they ain't real. Nice work by @ChristineSheare @KenCaldeira @SteveDavi…
RT @MichaelEWebber: For my family members who believe in chemtrails, they ain't real. Nice work by @ChristineSheare @KenCaldeira @SteveDavi…
FYI, for the uninitiated, "chemtrails" are the idea that the gov't is spraying chemicals into the atmosphere to control us. It's a popular conspiracy theory for which there is basically zero evidence. https://t.co/UtLyIdz3o0
For my family members who believe in chemtrails, they ain't real. Nice work by @ChristineSheare @KenCaldeira @SteveDavisUCI --> Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program https://t.co/xaL8Kh
@naomirwolf @ALoveGlow @SeanMMadden @KenCaldeira @DKeithClimate @GernotWagner @oscare2000 Like it happened multiple times in Italy with a few MPs involved (always the same ones). What a terrible waste of time and resources for a Parliament. I think we alre
@filmact1 https://t.co/6AQxjUPiLn Here's a peer reviewed published study about how the subject.
@BTBReviews @CAugustenborg @naomirwolf @billmckibben Shearer et al. 2016 "Our goal is not to sway those convinced that there is a secret, large-scale spraying program...but rather to establish a source of objective science that can inform public discourse.
RT @GeoeWatchDebunk: Dane Wigington claims this survey asked scientists if "chemtrails" are "real". Not true. The questionnaire did not use…
Dane Wigington claims this survey asked scientists if "chemtrails" are "real". Not true. The questionnaire did not use the word "chemtrail". It used SLAP (secret large-scale atmospheric spraying program). https://t.co/zZGuJvJ007
@stormcloud2010 @RonaldVermeij @RegimeChangeBC @_geoengineering @sarenc Got it. You have pictures of contrails. LOTS of them. I have every contrail and atmospheric deposition expert saying there is 0 evidence of chemtrails to be found. https://t.co
@stormcloud2010 @RonaldVermeij @RegimeChangeBC @_geoengineering @sarenc Which is consistence with what all the contrail and atmospheric deposition experts of the world are saying. No chem-trails and no large scale geoengineering occurring. https://t.co/
@llisal8on Just, no. Stop and read actual research by people who actually studied the field, not get their degrees through an hour on Google or on conspiracy threads. https://t.co/G22KCXID6S
@gperdikes @Strovoliotis @theopemptou @efixanthou @cygreens @sflourentzos If anyone is interested the link: Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program. https://t.co/ryjTcwymXQ
@naomirwolf @MickWest @PersonAwake @Er_Nope @DKeithClimate The full "SLAP" paper with figures is available here (as I mentioned to you earlier): https://t.co/iT4hsHXl2N
@naomirwolf @cmnit @PersonAwake @Er_Nope @DKeithClimate My role. I'm a writer. I write about contrails and the "chemtrail" theory quite often. I run the site "Contrail Science", I'm an author on this peer reviewed paper on evidence for a secret spraying pr
@naomirwolf @janieflegal @PersonAwake @DKeithClimate @MickWest Regarding coal ashes I guess you are talking about retracted papers by M.Herndon. Those "studies" are proven junk. About "ongoing geo" are you aware of the survey published here? https://t.co/i
RT @KenCaldeira: Do efforts to tamp down crazy conspiracy theories just give more life to those theories? Or is it important to try to re…
RT @KenCaldeira: Do efforts to tamp down crazy conspiracy theories just give more life to those theories? Or is it important to try to re…
RT @KenCaldeira: Do efforts to tamp down crazy conspiracy theories just give more life to those theories? Or is it important to try to re…
Do efforts to tamp down crazy conspiracy theories just give more life to those theories? Or is it important to try to replace paranoid fantasies with the mundane facts? @CarnegieScience @GeoeWatchDebunk https://t.co/foFhvdOPmv https://t.co/MTLKrmYv6H
Chemtrail craze got going out of a SPECULATIVE mid-1990s Navy paper about hypothetical weather control (https://t.co/bXY0ew1PyU) but has no origins in peer-reviewed science articles. Practically no one in the science community believes in chemtrails (https
@blancs_TX @GeoeWatchDebunk @Joespha1981 @mikejacobsen99 I've read lots of papers on potential SRM geoengineering. None on ACTUAL SRM geoengineering. Experts say trails are just contrails. https://t.co/i56OGm00F5